Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

My previous post: https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578688/#msg578688

The Holcomb generator works according to the algorithm of a mechanical synchronous generator.

The strength of the current in the phase conductor and its retention are no different from a traditional synchronous machine. The current strength of the phase conductor forms the main magnetic field in the stator and rotor cores.

The Holcomb system is a solid-state rotor system that completely repeats the operation of the mechanical rotor of a synchronous generator.

For small systems, you need to focus on repeating the rotor with permanent magnets, not doing garbage with maintaining the industrial frequency and mains voltage in the generator phase under load.

It is most efficient to model a system of at least four poles. The area of one magnetic pole of a mechanical rotor must be covered by at least three active electromagnets.

Between the poles, there must be a zone of one switched off electromagnet.

The laying of phase wires should occupy such a number of grooves that is placed on the area of ​​the turned off electromagnet.

The algorithm for the movement of the magnetic pole should allow one disabled electromagnet.

It is more efficient to make three phases of the generator, it is easier to keep the magnetic field from the phases of the generator.

The output voltage control circuit is in the appendix. Determine the number of phase laying wires by winding 10 control turns. The EMF of the idle phase must be at least 2U of the operating voltage of the battery.

This is what can be done, as you can see, it is no different from synchronous generators of mini hydroelectric power stations or wind turbines.

These are some of my tips for organizing the output phase of the oscillator. Good luck to all.

[kolbacict]

For small systems, you need to focus on the repetition of the rotor with permanent magnets,

Like this ?

[nix85]

@rakarskiy

I look at YOU bursting, you just don't get it.

You are making number of mistakes. To first make it absolutely clear, contrary to what you suggest
flux density at point near the side of a magnet is larger than flux density at distance from the side,
these are basic undeniable facts, even in diagram you posted, altho field lines are barely visible,
it is very obvious flux density is larger near the magnet (lines of flux are more closely packed).

Flux density is close to zero very very close to the side of the magnet but as clearly seen
in second to last attached photo magnets never approach very close. At closest point they are about two
magnet diameters away.

Now, as i have made clear already and you never admitted it is so altho it is undeniably so, when
two opposite fluxes approach the wire from opposite sides and they meet in the wire, wire is cutting
the flux and they both induce the same voltage direction, they are aiding.

So by these two facts alone 'experiment' is already dismissed. Fact that flux is larger near the magnet
and fact that two opposite fluxes approaching the wire from opposite sides are aiding, that is,
generating voltage of same polarity.

As i also wrote multiple times already, in addition to this induction by wire cutting fluxes,
every time two field lines from two magnets meet in the wire they merge and form one big loop
that passes through the loop of wire and loop of wire sees increase of flux.

So two types of induction are happening here, by wire cutting and by increase of flux through
the loop of wire.

And contrary to your claim that there should be no induction when magnets are closest, since flux
is densest near the magnet that is when rate of change is greatest and obviously most voltage is
induced at that moment, by both methods.

It is not matter of beliefs but of understanding induction and seeing the obvious.

[nix85]

however

Hi SL

My pleasure to share.

You are assuming page 11 provides some good insight relating to the Holcomb magnetics device operation. We don't even know if Holocomb device really has an operation. Besides, Sweet did not really know what he was saying. In addition to recently surfaced leaks of the insider, i already addressed their 'demonstration' of supposed 2.5kw in 20kw out, not very convincing at all.

"We got some load on right now" he says and points to the bulbs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkwYCpFMP8w

Test load we see are 12 incandescent bulbs. 20kw load? And when asked about this discrepancy they reply in the comments

"The 12-incandescent light bank is only a part of the load. There are also motors, transformers, capacitors, etc.in that load bank calculation.".

Well, capacitors are not a load, transformers neither except for the losses unless they are loaded with actual load, neither are motors unless they do work, free running also only consumes for losses.

This is not how you do a proper OU demonstration. It should be done in clear space without cables all around, device should not be plugged into the wall at all, load should be clearly shown, not just few bulbs in the background that don't amount to 1kW and claim 20kw.

As for your "however"..... firstly, i don't promote Sweet's 'theory' as something to go by, he is only shared for the motional electric field, nothing more nothing less. As for the 3 terms you mention "Negative Energy, Spacetime, virtual vacuum" are not exactly common "themes" of the past, but they are not understood by the mainstream. And these are not "OU Twilight Zone" but mechanics of time-space and etheric universal currents that need to be properly understood to understand OU.

I have elaborated in great depth on Kapandaze thread recently and on others before on all this. In short....

Negative energy is absolutely real, it is the antigravity current, it would be very foolish of you to dismiss this so better study it. As Phylos wrote in A Dweller it was the greatest discovery of Atlantis to find that law of gravitation has superimposed over it law of antigravitation and as the first belongs to what he called day side of nature - for same energy coming as etheric invisible non-herzian 'light' from the Sun CREATES light and heat in the upper atmosphere, and that the negative, reflected energy returning from Earth to the Sun is what Atlantis called Navaz or night-side forces, namely antigravity (at double frequency of gravity which is itself far above ultraviolete (non-herzian)), darkness and cold. Always when levitation is reported is also reported steep drop in temperature, the very Sweet we are discussing who reported to Bearden that his device lost all weight when fully loaded (1kW) and wires froze....this is literally the negative energy, this is the Maxin Light, this is the cold breeze on top of the head when kundalini is activated, this is the cold felt in room when 'ghosts' and any astral phenomena is present.

So as Phylos wrote and as Keely, Hollingshead and others experimentally proved and also clearly said in their papers, there are two vertical streams, positive inward one is what you call gravity (associated with heat death) and outward one associated with levitation (associated with cold and vitality, life). This is also exactly what Schauberger wrote and proved.

It is an etheric stream coming from the Sun in one form, dropping down into our dimension and back out of it in changed form.

So in short, negative energy is very very real, as i said Sweet reported it and countless others. When wires freeze at full load and things begin to float, that is it, very simple.

Further on, it is not spacetime but time-space, i wrote in great depth about all this and no need to repeat except shortly that God first creates a bucking field by two sets of vibrations 180° out of phase and gives structure to this abstract field by polarizing it with 6 axis of time thus creating 3d space. All this is i already explained here and it's also on my blog.

https://vril12.wordpress.com/6-axis-of-time/
https://vril12.wordpress.com

As for virtual vacuum or what they call virtual photons or virtual electron-positron pairs in the mainstream they are really talking about ether. All space is filled with these "bubbles of nothing", which are LITERALLY tiny voids in the densest medium of all, time-space itself. All space is filled with this primordial matter, materia prima, and it is almost imortal, planets and suns rise out of it and dissolve back into it, only at great dissolutions (pralaya) are these bubbles destroyed, that is, dissolved into yet higher form of matter which is contained within them, in fact, as i wrote many times, ether of lower planes is created by condensation of ether of higher planes, 49 bubbles of higher plane join to form a single bubble of a plane below it, and so on in russian doll like manner.

This condensing factor 49 is the reason density of matter, speed of light and rate of time flow all increase times fortynine each plane/octave above and this is how people travel intergalactic distances, by rising just one or two levels above, crossing the same distance in much shorter time and then recondensing.

Everything is made of universal currents. There are spirals within spirals, wheels within wheels, all is in motion, all IS motion.

All these things have extreme merit, this is the science of the magicians, wizards, this is the science of occultists, of secret military space programs, of ETs, of all who are intelligent everywhere and everywhen, and much of real engineering or physics data that can be leveraged into a usable form for further development is available, but it is scattered and delicate, rare have done the proper research and rare are able to get it. As i wrote many times, it is absolutely essential that one rises to higher energy level within himself before he can control the Force, whether by electronic means, or directly by Will, or both.

What may appear as more conventional scheme is you imposing on it what you want it to be. Sure, solar panel may be called overunity but it is in fact less than 20% efficient, but if for example backEMF is harvested for overunity, that is not a conventional scheme, ALL real overunity schemes are accessing the negative energy in some form, for all positive energy systems are by definition underunity.

And these higher aspects of science and technology, work of Keely, Hollingshead, Rota and many other great ones, and Sweet who produced the effects but did not understand what he was doing, these are not "tree hugging", these are Higher Science, Higher, Divine Technology.

One needs to seek that, not roll in the mud of herzian heat death (as Don put it).

Again, my pleasure to share.

Regards,

Nix

[rakarskiy]

For those who have the opportunity, here are some of my tips. (I updated my previous post https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578767/#msg578767  )
It is very difficult to do with the output of the mains frequency and voltage. Therefore, 24/48V is preferable for charging storage batteries. Excitation of electromagnets at full power. It is preferable to control the voltage value at the output of the controlled rectifier bridge.
When the power selection drops, the system charges the batteries and turns off, turns on with a sufficient load turned on or a voltage drop on the battery.