Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

Started by ramset, March 14, 2022, 11:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 56 Guests are viewing this topic.

rakarskiy

Ufopolitics, all these charms are studied on the course in any decent educational institution.
It is for this design that knowledge of electric and magnetic circuit currents is important.
If a gap of at least 1 m is made in the annular core, the result of magnetic induction will be different, much smaller.

Good luck to you! Sincerely yours!

kolbacict

Quote from: rakarskiy on May 04, 2022, 09:03:27 AM
I congratulate Robert Holcomb on the realization of an idea that is more than 110 years old.
I mentioned the similarity of the device with Figuera's device a month ago.
Nobody heard me .  :(
I just don't understand the role of switchable resistance.
It's just an ordinary rheostat. :)

pix

Quote from: rakarskiy on May 04, 2022, 07:35:41 AM
What is the basis of the action of the generator, leading to the effect of overunity. Just read an excerpt from a physics textbook:

Let me explain what is "surprising" in this issue, which everyone knows about and no one sees point-blank, that this is overunity. Imagine the winding of a toroidal transformer with an iron core and an air frame.

The intensity of the magnetic field, which is created in the ring core when current I flows through the winding, can be calculated by the formula: H = N*I/l, where: N is the number of turns; I - current strength in the wire, Ampere; l is the length of the ring along the midline, meters.

Let's say we have 75 turns, with a current in the wire equal to 1 Ampere and a length of the middle line of the ring core 100 mm (0.1 meter): H = N * I / l = 75 * 1 / 0.1 = 750 A / m

Source voltage U = 5 V, power is P = UI = 5 * 1 = 5 W

Absolute magnetic permeability: air = 1.25663753 * 10(−6) (0.000001257) gn / m, core = 0.0008792 gn / m, it remains only to calculate the magnetic induction at a magnetic field strength of the winding equal to 750 A / m:

Without core: B = μаH = 0.00000125663753 *750 = 0.000942478 T,

With a core: B = μaH = 0.0008792 * 750 = 0.6594 T.

With the same expended source power of 5 W, we obtained an increase in the resulting magnetic induction by 700 times.


:D  Then why every transformer isn't OU?
Listen, everyone who graduated secondary school knows what permeability is and that ferromagnetic materials amplify weak magnetic field.
As soon as you want to utilise that amplified magnetic field and current is flowing in the output coil-Lenz law applies, and small current in the output coil is enough to create opposite amplified magnetic field counter reacting  amplified magnetic field created by inducing current from the input coil. It works both ways.


Cheers,
Pix






ariovaldo

Years ago, I tried to replicate Figueira's setup, but I stopped short (no time). This video shows the resistance array that I put together ( just as an example)


https://youtube.com/shorts/nAeWdqSCTek?feature=share

rakarskiy

Quote from: kolbacict on May 05, 2022, 02:28:40 AM
I mentioned the similarity of the device with Figuera's device a month ago.
Nobody heard me .  :(
I just don't understand the role of switchable resistance.
It's just an ordinary rheostat. :)

Figuera, judging by his patents, has two designs in the form of a dynamo with fixed parts (1902), and a second patent (1908), revealing the essence of control, by changing the magnetic induction of the magnetic field in electromagnets, due to a smooth change in resistance in the circuit of electromagnets (through the slider contact of the ring rheostat). In 1902-1904 moving the moving contact over the rheostat was a common solution. It was Figuera who was the first to use this meter for a system for generating (more precisely, converting) electricity. Most importantly, I laid the phase wire in the gap between the electromagnets. "Y" in the diagram in the Figueira patent is exactly the element in which the phase wires are laid. Unlike Holcomb Energy Systems, Figuera has a single-phase design.
It is impossible to achieve magnetic induction so that the output power exceeds the excitation costs in the transformer version. This is only possible when the wire is inside the core (in the groove). This is one of the reasons why top-wound Gramm oscillators have become obsolete.
The patent shows a method for creating an alternating magnetic field in a magnetic circuit. Only the design of the magnetic chain itself is not shown, this is indicated in the patent.
Holcomb Energy Systems is already a more advanced solution for such a system.

Apart from Holcomb Energy Systems, there are other solutions for static converters. For the first time, only the practical operating model of Holcomb Energy Systems is presented. Others also exist but have not been shown publicly. There was another demonstration by Carl Tilly in the USA. But I did not find patents and information about the design system in the public domain. Carl Tilly was demonstrating an electric car, with his static converter. I don't think Carl Tilly's principle was different.

QuoteOn March 28, 2003, in the state of Tennessee, USA, 20 armed men confiscated all devices, documents and bank accounts of Tilly Foundation, Inc. So far, they have not returned anything or reimbursed the costs, said Carl Tilly, president and owner of the company. In order to protect the technology, just a week after the action, he had already begun building another electric car and two power sources for mansions. Now it's happening in another state. The latest electric car has been tested by several engineers and received a positive result.
https://tesla3.com/tilley-foundation/

PS  I'm also working on a pulse system that should keep the battery charged   https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/05/electric-solid-state-generator-tg.html