Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[onepower]

Rakarskiy

The question is, how are you going to stick with Holcomb if you don't understand how a traditional synchronous generator works? I just sort out how the generator works, where it comes from. By the way, the stator field is calculated in all design bureaus. Magnetomotive force from phase wires. It is she who excites our desired miraculous field.

It's problematic because while the switched coil/core rotor may act like a synchronous motor/generator and the inner multi pole switched coil stator may or may not this has little to do with the mechanism for gain. Holcomb states all that were presently debating is simply a precursor to something happening in the cores ie. extra electron spin alignment of the domains.

Has anyone actually built or tested anything?. Over a decade ago I was designing, building and testing my own AC motors and generators, synchronous, modified PWM H bridge, VFD, synchronous PM rotors, shaded pole, switched shaded pole, grid tied and island mode with static and variable capacitance phase correction. Been there done that first hand on my bench which is how I know many here are talking nonsense.

The fact is none of the stuff I have done in the past mentioned above gets anyone even remotely close to where Holcomb supposedly is today. Everyone and there dog has been down this road for the last 100 years and those skilled in the art understand it's a dead horse. As Nikola Tesla's best friend Mark Twain once remarked..."It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so."

Ergo, something has been missed, something fundamental to the process most overlooked was discovered by many of these FE inventors through countless hours of hands on experiments. Do you know how to succeed at FE?, I have done it many times, to actually discover something new we have to follow this procedure...
1)Think we know more than everyone else who came before us which is bs but build stuff to try to prove our claim anyways.
2)Fail miserably at every turn proving we know nothing but keep trying.
3)In time we may screw up and do something new by sheer accident which may lead to a new discovery.
4)Here we need the intelligence to understand we did screw up and something we didn't expect just happened.
5)If we can determine what happened then we can claim we knew it all along even if we had no idea how we actually did it.
6)Congratulations... your a FE inventor.

Regards
AC

[Feb2006]

Holcomb is building and testing working prototypes, Rakarskiy has nothing to show.
Still he is claiming his concept superior to Holcomb.
Rakarskiy 2000% vs Holcomb 750%.
Holcomb 1 Rakarskiy 0.

[rakarskiy]

In my video slides show the ratio of excitation power to the output power of a car alternator. The second slide, the assumption if you do the switching of electromagnets. This is an analysis, just of the Holcomb or patent system where the commutation is through Brushes and a collector. My project has not yet reached the goal, but I'm working on it.

[rakarskiy]

It seems that someone wants to nullify the disclosure of the principle of a solid-state generator system, with field rotation. Do not worry, I will make every effort, I have not yet told everything that has opened. A dynamically supported field appears in the system, it is rotated by a rotor, and not the rotating field itself, as they say in textbooks.
I will say more, this field induces itself, according to the principle, pass it on to another. Excitation is needed only for connection and rotation. Here with a twist and how to disassemble it, many, not only at a dead end, in complete prostration
A little hint, if you do not know how a classic synchronous generator works, with the winding laid in the core groove, you will never understand how the Holcomb Power System works.

[Feb2006]

My project has not yet reached the goal, but I'm working on it.

Hope you get there, but still Holcomb 1 Rakarskiy 0.[/size]

[/size]