Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[pix]

pix,

In mechanics, there is such an effect - "exomechanical", when two sources of torque (static and dynamic) act on the same load. A crank press with a flywheel works on this principle. One trouble is not a constant action, but by periods of charge-discharge (it is on this principle that the "Earth Engine" installation of the Energy Inductance Company works.
The principle that I am describing provides for the low-cost creation of an electric field for a reactor, with electrostatic induction on a conductor closed in a circuit with a load. In my version, two circuits are connected into one. We get an analogy with mechanics.
I'm glad that you have your opinion, but I won't give up mine until I check it.
Earth in my version is needed only as a zero driver for a high-voltage circuit, but the system can work without earth at all.

Sincerely.

Attached mechanical equivalent to "Tesla" style energy accumulation. Resonator accumulates "low grade" energy into more useable.
There is no "free energy".
But a lot of "low grade non useable" energy around us that could be converted to useable.
Closed loop will not give you any OU. You need to have some source.
Those who do nod understand concept of a thermodynamic heat pump will not understand so called OU.



Cheers,
Pix

[kolbacict]

They won't take us in, my friend Rakarsky, no matter how hard you try.
Among several billion people there is no place for the two of us.
Too many humiliating procedures to go through, even if it happens.
It is more difficult only, perhaps, to make a perpetual motion machine.

[rakarskiy]

Attached mechanical equivalent to "Tesla" style energy accumulation. Resonator accumulates "low grade" energy into more useable.
There is no "free energy".
But a lot of "low grade non useable" energy around us that could be converted to useable.
Closed loop will not give you any OU. You need to have some source.
Those who do nod understand concept of a thermodynamic heat pump will not understand so called OU.

Cheers,
Pix

pix

everything is much simpler, we take the usual formula for kinetic energy:     Ek = 1/2mV^2

1)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 10 m/s ^2  = 50 J

2)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 50 m/s ^2  = 1250 J

we increased the speed by 5 times from the first option, and the energy increased by 25 times.


pix, so the whole secret of OU is speed!   

PS

And with EMF, we have two speeds, the speed of the flow in Tesla [volt * second / square meter], and the rate of change of this flow around the conductor [Hz (number of times per second]!
Here's a puzzle for you to think about.

[pix]

pix

everything is much simpler, we take the usual formula for kinetic energy:     Ek = 1/2mV^2

1)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 10 m/s ^2  = 50 J

2)  Ek = 1/2 * 1 kg * 50 m/s ^2  = 1250 J

we increased the speed by 5 times from the first option, and the energy increased by 25 times.


pix, so the whole secret of OU is speed!   

...and to increase speed of a given mass takes energy.
When you accelerate your car you increases your kinetic energy, but on the expense of fuel.


PS. Regarding Tesla resonator. Rate of change is constant, it is resonance of secondary. What matters is a constant influx of energy from primary that is trapped in secondary. Method of utilization of that "high grade trapped energy" may vary. Exact mechanical equivalent of such mechanism I did attached as pdf in my previous post. Tesla is a beautifull utilisation of low grade energy compressed into high grade useable one.

[rakarskiy]

...and to increase speed of a given mass takes energy.
When you accelerate your car you increases your kinetic energy, but on the expense of fuel.


PS. Regarding Tesla resonator. Rate of change is constant, it is resonance of secondary. What matters is a constant influx of energy from primary that is trapped in secondary. Method of utilization of that "high grade trapped energy" may vary. Exact mechanical equivalent of such mechanism I did attached as pdf in my previous post. Tesla is a beautifull utilisation of low grade energy compressed into high grade useable one.

Oh pix, you are tricky, in your arguments you are similar to "an adherent of the Commission on Pseudoscience of Russian Ostriches" Do not be offended, I have seen enough of these adherents.

We consider the simplest crank press, drive power 8.5 kW at 800 rpm, torque 101 Nm.
The force on the press table develops at 10 kilonewtons, at 8 rpm of the crank shaft.
8:1 downshift torque will increase to 1 kN, (speed down, power up)!

In this case, the press develops a force of 10 kN eight times in 1 minute, while the motor makes 800 rpm. (time span 1 minute)
7.5 seconds per revolution, while the pressing action itself is up to 2 seconds.
2 seconds * 8 times/revolution = 16 seconds.
16/60 = 0.26 of a period of one minute.
10 kN * 8 * 0.26 = 20.8 kN.

And so with a decrease from the motor on the shaft of 1 kNm, and the press developed 20.8 kN, while doing the work of pressing 8 parts.