Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

Thanks rakarskiy,
So your "understanding completely intersected" means Holcomb's device operates on the same principle as an alternator with a locked rotor, correct?
bi

In this experiment, just, the rotor of a single-phase generator is "locked" at a certain position in the stator of the same single-phase generator. The result is approximately СOP-2 in several variants of the conduction, there is also a zero result. Can you explain step by step how it works?

Experience just demonstrates that the system works with a COP result > 1.
I'm thinking about the performance of the Holcomb Energy System with OverUnity, it's not worth pulling any more, look for an engineering solution, get the result.

The Holcomb generator works in exactly the same way as a mechanical synchronous generator.

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/static-electromagnetic-transducer.html

[kolbacict]

The video is disgusting, I agree, like my whole life. But I have a picture, it can add more brightness ...
My phone is broken, it takes a picture with stripes, I can't publish new videos on my YouTube channel, it requires confirmation of authorization. When I try to login, I can't do it.
This war is on, damn it.

[bistander]

Dear kolbacict,
Sorry to bother you. Thanks for the attempt. Hopefully situation improves. God bless you.
bi

[bistander]

In this experiment, just, the rotor of a single-phase generator is "locked" at a certain position in the stator of the same single-phase generator. The result is approximately СOP-2 in several variants of the conduction, there is also a zero result. Can you explain step by step how it works?

Experience just demonstrates that the system works with a COP result > 1.
I'm thinking about the performance of the Holcomb Energy System with OverUnity, it's not worth pulling any more, look for an engineering solution, get the result.

The Holcomb generator works in exactly the same way as a mechanical synchronous generator.

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/static-electromagnetic-transducer.html

Hi rakarskiy,
I think I could explain it, but I'm not going to attempt at distance on this format. Your explanation is confusing. But it appears that you treat the Variac like a resistor. That is incorrect. Perhaps another member can chime in.
bi

[partzman]

Hi Pm,
Saturation occurs at a specific level of "flux density" so the following statement is confusing.

Did you mean this?

then the rotor poles would be capable of very high flux without saturating.

No, it actually is flux density or flux per core cross sectional area.  For example, take any closed core and wind a single coil on it.  Apply a voltage to the coil until saturation is reached and take notes of all the parameters when this happens.  Now, remove the original coil and wind two coils on the same core that when in a buck mode they equal the inductance of the original.  This will require more wire so the penalty is increased DCR.  Now apply a voltage to this arrangement until you reach saturation of the core and compare to the original single coil.  Depending on the core shape/type used, you will find the saturation level is much higher.  This was my point with the Holcomb rotor.

I've gone through this rotor layout in detail. You can find the exchange/discussion with Ufopolitics earlier in this thread.** I'll attach a patent drawing which I marked up for reference.

In a standard motor or generator, the stator is the primary (connected to the 3-phase mains)*, so it determines the pole count, which is 4 (2 pole pairs, N,S,N,S around the rotor) indicated by shading on the diagram. Each pole encompasses 4 rotor teeth. When applying Faraday's equation, the average flux per pole, or the integration of flux density over the area of the pole cross section at the air gap is used. This value of flux/pole is consistent throughout the magnetic circuit at all times except for leakage flux (typically small percentage). The section of the magnetic circuit having the least cross sectional area will saturate soonest with increasing excitation. The cross sectional area of 4 teeth below (towards the shaft) or area around/adjacent possibly including the shaft is substantially smaller than the area of 4 tooth tips or the pole at air gap. That is where saturation will occur. That was the basis or logic of my comment regarding saturation. That area, compared to similar feature of an ordinary rotor (as found in a NEMA induction motor) is so reduced as to appear ridiculous, IMO. Not to mention structural integrity and fabrication difficulty.

And then there is the whole winding scheme where over half of the conductors in the slots cancel out. Refer to earlier discussion.

I hope that clears it up.
bi

*It appeared from the patent text that stator was of conventional design.

** See reply 285, https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/285/

I have built small bench versions of Holcomb's linear generator with 2-4 poles and with bucking modes used in the "rotor", there is a usable output on the "stator" that will power a load.  However, as you contend, the device is conservative at this stage.  IMO therefore, the secret which has not been disclosed in any of his IP AFAIK, is how he is collecting the output from the stator?  My own previous research in Lenz reduction points to solutions using constant current loading on a secondary by itself or in conjunction with a tracking voltage source on the secondary.

Regards,
Pm