Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

Hello Rakarskiy!

Sorry, but, Bistander would not accept any application that even mentions the word "vortex(es)" related to anything that has to do with magnetic field(s).

Bistander is a purely "Lorentzian", not a Maxwellian when it comes to Magnetic Fields and their vortex or curl calculus...

Straight, rigid vectors of force only accepted on his world, like B, F or else...

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hello!
Thanks for the clarifications. If a person does not perceive something worse for him. And the term "vortex" did not arise from scratch. I used to be wary of it as well, but having figured it out, I know exactly what it means. Even the magnetic flux line of force has a vortex design. This is not speculation, this is research that physicists don't want to accept.
The problem is that their waste paper in libraries will have to be scrapped.
  Sincerely.

[bistander]

But aren't notations defined in high school textbooks?
Well, this is a vector:
(Bm) - the magnetic induction of the magnetic flux of the external environment,
(Bi) - the magnetic induction of the wire with current strength,
(-E) - the EMF of the conductor.
...

I will write down a detailed chain of equations for electromagnetic induction. The moment when the circuit is closed is recorded.

Bm = -E:  -E = Bi;   (Bm= Bi) 
...

Hello rakarskiy,
thanks. I needed to verify your interpretation of symbols. In doing so, then I say your equations from yesterday are in error. Again by error, I mean contradict or disagree with conventional teaching (textbook equations).

But that's the way you operate.
bi

[bistander]

well i know how do not miss the interaction at both ends . And to keep the design flat.
I have already shown this. Just close it in a ring. By the way, you can also do this with
your separate magnetic circuits. Where the hell is my beer?!

Good idea!!!!
bi

ps. I wish I could deliver your beer.

[rakarskiy]

Hello rakarskiy,
thanks. I needed to verify your interpretation of symbols. In doing so, then I say your equations from yesterday are in error. Again by error, I mean contradict or disagree with conventional teaching (textbook equations).

But that's the way you operate.
bi

In any case, the equations are completely drawn for the generator frame.

http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_pu/1/56642742.jpg

Sincerely.

[rakarskiy]

A paragraph from my book, just edited!

Dr. Holcombe's system mimics the movement of a physical rotor. Thus, in general, a permanent flow of magnetic current is carried out on the pole. This ensures the continuity of a permanent magnetic flux in the magnetic circuit. At the same time, the movement of the magnetic circle (circulation around the axis) is carried out, which crosses the conductor wires embedded in the grooves, without the physical rotation of the magnetic rotor. A brilliantly simple solution.

Just, everything fell into place, everything is possible for the engineering calculation of the structure.