Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

To all,
Thinking about Holcomb's device, I came up with a question. First, from my experience and knowledge, electromagnetic energy conversion is reversible. Fundamental principles are that input and output can be switched. Now, with application specific machinery, excitation may require reconfiguration, as in the example of using the automotive alternator as a motor. I think we've all seen that done. The point is, the EM process (say at the air gap) is reversible.
So.
What happens when you reverse the input and output on Holcomb's device? Does excess energy go back into the iron atoms?
bi

[SolarLab]

Hi SL,
First, please answer those questions in my previous post. I'll paste them here:

with regards to LinGen, what is the steady state performance from a simulation conducted with the parameters arrived at using the CAE? What is the calculated output for the device you are building? For input, earlier you said "1 Amp, 300 Turns". Is that average current or for pulse duration and is it still applicable?
... you say 500 turns for the lap winding on the stator. The diagrams show only 4 turns. Is this a change?
______
With that updated info, I'll recheck my notes and get back to you.
bi

ps. Not needed with answers to questions above, but if you, or anyone, could answer:

Is the functionality the same between Holcomb's linear configuration and his circular machine, as in input/output circuitry and gain technique?

OK, but this is the last one. I'm quite busy with other pressing things - for quite a while, it now appears...

Steady state is what you see in the "Block Diagram" Output graph - increases a bit but stabilizes at around 20Vpp. Primary tests show a
bit lower (might be down a couple of volts, more or less). These values are completely arbitrary; just a wild ass guess - results are shown
for the initial simulation but I'm not going to interupt an analysis run, just to check.

What you see in the Lap winding is the outline of the Lap Coil which can be whatever turns you specify - the CAE uses an "envelope outline"
of the Winding which is composed of whatever turns is specified. This is the same for the "envelope outline" of the Rotor winding. This has been
explained many times in the threads regarding how the CAE handles Coils. Also this is clearly explained in the CAE manuals, etc..

Linear and circular are fundamentally the same except for the metal - the circular is simply sectioned and stretch out from what i know.
Haven't completed a circular one yet, and probably will not any time soon. Rotating or sliding magnetic field should be the same except
possibly at the ends of the Linear due to the break in the metal structure. Again, TBD. No difference in I/O unless there is something else
within the circular configurations.

You'll have to figure that one out for yourself.

Again - this is not a COOK BOOK and your results may vary. Its for educational purposes only! An introduction to the technology at best.

It's geared to those that may have some skill-in-the-art - as delineated in pretty much all patent disclosures. That's where I got it from.

SL

[bistander]

OK, but this is the last one. I'm quite busy with other pressing things - for quite a while, it now appears...

Steady state is what you see in the "Block Diagram" Output graph - increases a bit but stabilizes at around 20Vpp. Primary tests show a
bit lower (might be down a couple of volts, more or less). These values are completely arbitrary; just a wild ass guess - results are shown
for the initial simulation but I'm not going to interupt an analysis run, just to check.

What you see in the Lap winding is the outline of the Lap Coil which can be whatever turns you specify - the CAE uses an "envelope outline"
of the Winding which is composed of whatever turns is specified. This is the same for the "envelope outline" of the Rotor winding. This has been
explained many times in the threads regarding how the CAE handles Coils. Also this is clearly explained in the CAE manuals, etc..

Linear and circular are fundamentally the same except for the metal - the circular is simply sectioned and stretch out from what i know.
Haven't completed a circular one yet, and probably will not any time soon. Rotating or sliding magnetic field should be the same except
possibly at the ends of the Linear due to the break in the metal structure. Again, TBD. No difference in I/O unless there is something else
within the circular configurations.

You'll have to figure that one out for yourself.

Again - this is not a COOK BOOK and your results may vary. Its for educational purposes only! An introduction to the technology at best.

It's geared to those that may have some skill-in-the-art - as delineated in pretty much all patent disclosures. That's where I got it from.

SL

Thanks SL,
So then you have output voltage of 20V_pp. I see it is not sinusoidal, but for an rms value, let's pretend, giving 7.07 volts. You said to use a 1 kOhm load. That figures to 50 mW output, assuming unity pf.
For input, I fully realize what you're saying, that is why my first attempt requested a current density. Surely there has to be a figure used for, or from the CAE. Is it correct for me to use the figure of 1 amp with 300 T/c as you stated previously? I guess I'll use 1A_rms.
bi

[SolarLab]

Thanks SL,
So then you have output voltage of 20V_pp. I see it is not sinusoidal, but for an rms value, let's pretend, giving 7.07 volts. You said to use a 1 kOhm load. That figures to 50 mW output, assuming unity pf.
For input, I fully realize what you're saying, that is why my first attempt requested a current density. Surely there has to be a figure used for, or from the CAE. Is it correct for me to use the figure of 1 amp with 300 T/c as you stated previously? I guess I'll use 1A_rms.
bi

Yea, your probably right - the device is bogus. Maybe the instruments need calibration, or the favorite one around here - I read them wrong.
I'll inform the CAE companies and let them know their shit doesn't work as well.

Thanks for the great insight. Appreciated. Have a good one.

SL

[bistander]

Yea, your probably right - the device is bogus. Maybe the instruments need calibration, or the favorite one around here - I read them wrong.
I'll inform the CAE companies and let them know their shit doesn't work as well.

Thanks for the great insight. Appreciated. Have a good one.

SL

SL,
I understand envelope outline, but at some point you need to reduce it to practice and wind with actual wire and defined number of turns. Since you're building a prototype, I thought you were at this stage. But apparently not. The one snafu which I intended to address deals directly in this area, I'll wait until you complete the synthesis. Let me know.
bi