The breakthrough in Free Energy - a system that cannot be debunked

[mrwayne]

Oh I understand the system perfectly.

If your system worked, it could be easily simplified using standard plumbing equipment, not requiring any hydraulics or microcontrollers. It is you who don't understand your own design.

It is a pity this field contains charlatans like you MrWayne. Scammers like you give the hard working people, like most on this forum truly trying to find OU a bad name.

Lol I don't get upset by people with no manners - because you throw away your respectability.


Take care

[mrwayne]

Thanks Wayne I appreciate you sharing . Very interesting. I thought Marcus videos were a lot fun and the effect is intriguing

Thank You Jim,


Markus did a great job, he is amazing! His modeling of the travis effect was a mistake - here is a link to the original video by Tom.


Travis Effect 5


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uW0LKPM0Tvk


Thats my channel if you want to watch all five Videos Tom made.


Wayne

[mrwayne]

" it is already in the spread sheet I gave you " yes, the spreadsheet: Garbage in-garbage out. Reminds me of Elon Musk's 'white papers".

Use questions when you don't understand, and you will learn more.



Its ok if its hard to grasp - better people than you and I struggled over it.. that may be why something so simple was so hard to discover.


[size=78%]Mr Wayne[/size]

[mrwayne]

Once again you show your ignorance of the physics behind displacement. It doesn't matter if the inner containers are filled with air, water or lead.

I am sorry if this sounds rough - but it does matter - if the inner and outer are connected - its your demonstrated lack of experience with buoyancy that is confusing you - try to be a bit more patient, you are learning new things.


When connected - the water weight cancels a portion of the buoyancy - BOOM, that portion of the buoyancy is directly the cause of the work difference - Ka Boom.


So look closer at the video - and find the connection point - and redo your work.


Mr Wayne

[mrwayne]

So for those of you who have been following - a couple of critics here just revealed why my system has a work difference - Now they don't get it yet - but they will.


When the one side is being pulled down - its buoyancy is "the actual air volume" value of buoyancy - and this is the input cost (sinking a buoyant object a distance).


Now this sinking action positions the other side in the Initial Travis Effect position - and as everyone should d know by now - the Travis effect is special for the fact that the buoyancy work exceeds the air volume required.


Work in - standard buoyancy, work out exceeds standard buoyancy.


The clever part is how the "work in" also eliminates an air transfer cost.


Thanks for checking it out.


Mr Wayne


[size=78%] [/size]