Lenz isolation device

[floodrod]

@ onepower, I know I'm gonna get flamed for this but screw it.  I'm going out on a limb here by assuming that this thread is in reference to mitigating the mechanical effects of inducing current in a coil (drag).  If so then I believe the way to do this has been shown to us in the Utkin paper (the only thing of real significance in that paper) from ages ago.  You simply don't allow current to flow and work off the changing difference in potential that's created in said coil. That changing difference in potential creates an changing electric field, and that electric field (non static) is due to a verifiable quantity (that can affect charges) that radiates outwardly effectively 1/r that if expressed uniformly in an area even while changing would not produce a magnetic field in that area but outside of it.  You would then use the outward area for induction and effectively bypass the mechanical effects of inducing current in your primary. It's still cause/effect. This would be one of its uses and is a really old idea that's long overdue.

Wayne.

Wayne,

Can you post some more info and links regarding this? I am quite interested to hear more about this.

Thanks

[kolbacict]

this has been shown to us in the Utkin paper

This?

[norman6538]

We test the Lenz counter to motion principle by using a magnet and coil on a pendulum. And if you short the coil there will be less swings because the flux generated causes a repel on approach and an attraction as the coil leaves dead center where there is no current produced because the flux is evenly/balanced  pushed into the coil.

Come back with your swings count. I hope it works.

Norman

[bistander]

...
Normally A produces an action on B and we could assume the fact that it has results in a reaction from B back to A, equal and opposite as Faraday implied. It is symmetrical by design however what if A on arriving at B transformed into more A?.  Now we have more A and no B, what then?... that's the question.

Regards
AC

A Black Hole.
We should avoid those.
bi

[floodrod]

We test the Lenz counter to motion principle by using a magnet and coil on a pendulum. And if you short the coil there will be less swings because the flux generated causes a repel on approach and an attraction as the coil leaves dead center where there is no current produced because the flux is evenly/balanced  pushed into the coil.

Come back with your swings count. I hope it works.

Norman

That's one way. And easier way is to hook your coil to a power supply and spin your rotor the way the magnetism pulls it. If your amperage goes down, lenz drag is affecting your coil. But if your amperage goes up, then you have something special