Room for Free Energy and its Physics

[Tarsier_79]

Mr Wayne.

I have not learnt anything from being here. I do not believe your design produces excess energy. With the limited differential height between your risers while you are still trying to use the power stroke at its maximum potential, I really don't see how you can vent the air quick enough to the other side to make use of the principle you describe. If you vent the air outside, you might get this movement, but then you will have to input more energy later.

From your diagrams you claim that the free energy comes from the displaced volume. I see no free energy. All I see is force x distance in = force x distance out.

I believe the lossy system you use for recovery is counter-intuitive. It can easily be improved, but without an over-unity transaction to begin with, there is no point in doing so. IMO, the only advantage these hydraulic pistons give is a potential way to fraudulently hide energy input into the real world system.

There is a relatively easy physical way to prove your mechanism works without the hydraulics attached. Your setup is not difficult to mimic and force inputs and outputs are not difficult to measure. If I thought there was an inkling of potential here, I would perform this test. At the moment, as I do not, I have better ways to spend my time and energy in pursuit of free energy.

[mrwayne]

Mr Wayne.

I have not learnt anything from being here. I do not believe your design produces excess energy.  All I see is force x distance in = force x distance out.

Well, You said it better than I could..


If that's all you can see, I am sorry, you missed it all.






Mr. Wayne

[mrwayne]

Ok for all of you who can see: 


"I can't see" is not a surprise - It took nearly 40 designs to get all four fundamentals to operate in the right order - so it is simple now.


Yet, the COTI System is Brilliant.


Combining a counterbalance system to eliminate wasted lifting
Orientation to eliminate the need for an air mover
Travis Effect to reduce the cost of reset below Unity
Intelligent design a looped process which repeatedly provides free energy.


For free energy, this an extremely intelligently designed system which causes a remainder - each and every Stroke - if it was simple to imagine or conceive - then we would have had it many years ago.


Like Kaine explained, its just "looks" like a equal system; but that is the mere illusion that kept it's secret.


If it were two Banks - that had a different value for a dollar - anyone could design a process to make money continuously - deposit your dollar in the bank that has the lower value, transfer your funds to the higher value, and take that and deposit into the first bank again - and repeat... your deposits will increase by the difference of the value of the banks continually.


1. The Travis Effect needs less input volume to create lift greater than its volume - due to the pod or displacer


2. The Sink only has the resistance of the lowered volume


3. Greater lift than the volume - sink at the cost of the actual volume


There is your 10lift-5sink=5remainder (Available)


If I plugged the machine in to pay for the sink  - it would look like this; 10/5=2 or 200%


So those of you who do see - congratulations! you are on a new frontier of science. But get ready - some people can't deal with the cheese being moved..


Here is a scale size of a 50KW model, the taller tube on top is because in our commercial models - we do the output, input, and Air transfer all through the top of the machine. 


Mr Wayne

[broli]

Besides an artist rendition has this 50kW been installed anywhere. If not when will it be operating at a third party under production circumstances? It's strange that little progress has been made to commercialize this in ten years seeing how "simple" the device is.

[mrwayne]

Besides an artist rendition has this 50kW been installed anywhere. If not when will it be operating at a third party under production circumstances? It's strange that little progress has been made to commercialize this in ten years seeing how "simple" the device is.

There is a term, rolling on the floor laughing - ROFL... yes it is simple now - like designing flying airplanes is now easy, and controlling drones is now easy and calling internationally is now easy... because someone took all the time and money to make it easy... over 250 "someone" working non stop over 10 years...


One of my engineers Quipped "I would have been finished by now if I was in charge... I said really - and I pulled out 8 years of research and development which led the version which is economically viable, reliable, controlled, high power density, and environmentally safe.... and I asked - which one of these could you have unlocked faster?


He said "I see your point, every step was required to come to the completed system, and no one could have done it faster..... no one else would have stuck with it through all that work..I would not have" 


Ten years ago, a troll stated - "if I cant buy it at Walmart, or if the inventor isn't powering his house -then its not real" These are idiots....


These comments come from people who never dealt with new science in their lives and have no practical understanding of the length, breadth, and cost of researching and developing new science.


Now add to that doing that work while defending the world against the oppression by the FBI and the State - for 7 years.


In Theory - you have to solve problems and recognize problems that don't exist


In design - you create things to test your theory and see if you can bend the outcome or the result - and to see if any new observation is created or new knowledge is discovered (and restart the theory process)


In development - and you think you may be onto something - you fabricate, build, and alpha tests every individual function and functional aspect of the specific part of the process you are trying to control - or gain reliability of outcome. FOR EVERYTHING - when a OU person says - "I don't think it will work" this is a someone who does not "think" its laziness; either show why it does or does not work - or go eat popcorn and watch.


In testing, you have to know how to value the outcome, and verify the results - now when you are in new science - like UNDER UNITY operations - there is no expert to ask for help, there is not book, you tube, and no Google search which gives results - you have to think on your own - determine facts - not opinions - you have to become the expert.


Third Party - now this is a real joke - who in this group has experience with real energy generation, who has tested positive real free energy (besides my team), and beside the ones who have congratulated me privately - and so who is qualified to do third party testing? The ones who are qualified - already did!


When Some one calls and says - "I have 22 years in testing failed buoyancy or gravity systems" .... Well, that SUCKS DOESNT IT - that's all they got.


In my teams case - science unlocked, engineering unlocked, additional LAWS of physics, design unlocked, economic viability surpassed, proofs of concepts built and tested...


I made it simple for you - its a new frontier in science, it was not simple to get too - in fact - it was hard.


I have "hard systems" for every aspect (including a dozen new discoveries not in this model).

WalMart will never have one to sell - I may never hook one to my house - I may install them to generate free hydrogen and provide fuel, or a hundred other uses for a lot of free power.


My home utility is $200 bucks a month - my 100KW model makes over $7,000 worth of electricity every month - does that make since at all?


We will be installing them where they are needed, where energy is consumed at high volumes - its economics - I would be stupid to install one where I could only use 3% of it...

Your welcome.


Mr Wayne