Deductions from the Quaternion Form of Maxwell's Electromagnetic Equations

[alan]

Thanks, I also found this paper recently. 
Put this next to Floyd Sweet's writing and try to deduce with this hypothesis. 
A time conjugate (out of phase, or reflected by a 'mirror' source) team EM-wave with B waves cancelling and E waves adding, it becomes a B+(-B) E+E wave, or a standing electrostatic only wave which change doesn't generate B fields anymore.   
Try to see if this can explain the behavior of coupled inductors in designs like shark and kapa, meyer and literally all of them.  Especially Figuera. 
credits to emjunke for pointing this out since a long time ago

[ramset]

Alan
Would be nice if you qualified your "confident comment" by teaching us an actual gain mechanism?


Tripping over so many FE devices ( you mention with such confidence to understand the gain mechanism ??)


Please share just one true gain mechanism which can survive a bench replication / verification for
Peer review.
The floor is all yours !

Respectfully
Chet K



PS
Here the group which was many years working with person you "credit " above
And after much disappointment and dead ends ( and unnecessary drama)
Started a new more open group !


https://www.beyondunity.org/


Please teach us ...or it ends up looking like another baseless taunt ....?

[Ufopolitics]

Hello,

I just got such a simple question, basically for those who believe they "know it all"...and yes, it refers basically to MAGNETISM.

Why do we always need to wind a coil in a circular pattern*, in order to obtain a Magnetic Field?

Why a magnetic field is NOT generated if we just wind the wire in a "zig-zag" pattern**?

*circular pattern, referring to always making a consecutive and continuously wound loop, it don't matter if later on, we press it and make it flatter...is still a "circular pattern flattened"...And, of course, (for any "smart cookie) it don't need to be "exactly circular", but square, triangular, etc,etc.

**zig-zag pattern, referring to gathering the wire in a ZlZlZlZlZ flat pattern...or could also be in a U^U^U type shape, flat.

Obviously in both examples we simply apply the same electrical -/+ power to both wire ends...however, the zig-zag will not generate a Magnetic Field...

Why?

Regards

Ufopolitics

[kolbacict]

Hello,

Why do we always need to wind a coil in a circular pattern*, in order to obtain a Magnetic Field?
Ufopolitics

You know that a wire laid in a zigzag is a bifilar, which has no inductance, and therefore does not create a magnetic field.  But it introduces a delay in the passage of the signal in time.

[alan]

Alan
Would be nice if you qualified your "confident comment" by teaching us an actual gain mechanism?


Tripping over so many FE devices ( you mention with such confidence to understand the gain mechanism ??)


Please share just one true gain mechanism which can survive a bench replication / verification for
Peer review.
The floor is all yours !

Respectfully
Chet K

I only point in the right direction.

What are Tesla-waves? 
I won't rant too much, but I think the key is interferometry of conjugate EM wavepairs, because the Whittaker paper points in this direction. 
How can the info be used to find out how to convert reactive power into real power? 
Just assume 'Figuera' works, then these papers will help explain it and you will deduce the mechanism.
IMHO Cancel B, add E, in magnetic synchronism using multiple coils to create a standing scalar potential.
Or reactive VxI to standing V, nature provides the I via Ohm's law. (Didn't Don Smith do ths?)
regards 

edit 
Bearden wrote this: 
In two fundamental papers in 1903 and 1904, Whittaker showed that all present vector EM can be replaced by scalar potential interferometry, and that bidirectional harmonic EM plane wave sets could be used to produce a standing wave of force-field-free potential