Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method

[C.O.P.1000]

I like your tenacity Nix...Are you in?

To start from the end, i am sure enough about my convictions and i have no doubt when i put my energy and funds in certain methods that i will eventually succeed but i made it clear many times, that i have not succeeded yet (am working on something related but different right now). So it is not hard to understand i can not guide you step by step to make a working device, and your sentence "I would accept the challenge from someone else if I had the knowledge and experience you have." and other sentences around it are not appropriate and are even verging on rude, firstly, it is not about challenges, but cooperation, sharing, and again, i cannot guide you a,b,c to do something i have not done (yet).

I stated openly and it is very clear that i am sharing methods i BELIEVE in, often backed up with examples i BELIEVE to be genuine, and explanations why they should work, nothing more and nothing less. For example for flyback i explained clearly that energy "transferred" (nothing is really transferred) through a transformer is proportional to flux times frequency and that 1-5% of full load energy is enough to establish full flux and thus full potential energy in the core. It follows logically from this that flyback mode should be overunity - and this is what we hear from so many sources. I have not seen anyone correlate this so clearly around here or anywhere - the fact that no load flux is max and that max flux means full potential energy - created by tiny input - also correlated with the fact that modern high perm cores need tiny input current to generate large flux.

Or the work of Janos Vajda, and the fact that energy of a wave is amplitude squared E = A² and thus uniting two same waves should double the overall energy. Vajda measured max of 48% increase over unity if i remember correctly.

https://overunity.com/18239/the-solution/dlattach/attach/179171/

So here we have principle of wave superposition, of resonance. And from best researchers in the field it's been heard since long time it all comes down to separating the input from the output with resonant systems, mechanical or electromagnetic, bigger the better, higher q the better. Of course this is not the only method, methods ala Ed Gray and Kunel are different, and there are of course many others not relying on resonance. There are so many approaches one needs to find what he resonates with the most.

Also, even someone who has done it - best he can is tell you how he did it, considering how delicate these things are, chances are almost certainly you would fail to replicate him, so it is always best to follow your intuition, build up your own knowledge and intelligence to the point where solutions open up, and always follow the method(s) YOU like the best, not just for sake of success.

With all that said, considering you apparently just want to confirm overunity with a looped 10W device. As i said few times already, i cannot guide you nor will i partake in any "challenge", but i can suggest, if you are sincere and determined, to follow these well known principles and mostly follow your intuition and what you feel is the best method for you. If you're just after any method just to prove overunity, i guess i would suggest you the tuned pendulum + weighted spring method. But i am not even suggesting, i am just saying generally, if i were suggesting the simplest method i believe can yield success, it would be that or even simpler just a big pendulum turning a PMG by a belt. In the end, it's all up to you, and each one of us.

Nix

[Dog-One]

Okay fair enough.  I wish I had your energy.   

And you can call me rude if you would like.  Doesn't hurt my
feelings.  From my upbringing, rude would be something like,
"Put up or shut up b*tch!".  That's not me, not how I roll.  We
can come to an understanding, but I will caution you, there are
others watching and they have different tolerance thresholds.

I also recognize what "i BELIEVE" means.  We all have a unique
perception of the world around us and rarely does it happen when
two randomly picked individuals share an identical one.  I happen
to "KNOW" a few things that you wouldn't "BELIEVE", maybe not
even after I showed it to you.  So please, let's not go there right
away.

Since you haven't been successful yourself at this work, let's try
slowing the noise down just a wee bit.  This stuff is difficult enough
without being buried in information.  The sharing of information is
fine if it is actual bench work to confirm some piece of the mountains
of data already floating around.  I have terabytes of information on
my server.  I have an epic fail pile of devices large enough to fill
a 26 foot pup trailer.  If someone asks me about something I may
still remember, I'll find it and give it to them, but I don't firehose
folks with it.  Doing so doesn't help the cause.  We need serious
participation here.  We need to get our hands dirty and figure out
something that works, then engage in discussion and nail down the
details well enough for others to experience the same phenomena
on their bench.

If you are convinced these devices really are so delicate they
cannot be replicated, then we're screwed and Stefan should just
retire and relieve himself of all the responsibility and grief keeping
this site operational.  I personally don't feel that way.  I think if
someone makes a device, they should be able to make a second
one that also works and then others should be able to do it too.
That's what we looking for I'm pretty certain.

So all I'm asking for here is let's get focused.  Concentrate on
something you can manifest and make it so.  Then we can talk
about it and go from there.

Also, who is Dan Combine?  That you or someone you know?

For starters, this little circuit needs to be researched carefully
to determine if it does anything helpful.

[ramset]

A true time bandit ....
Taking peoples lives one minute at a time ( this you would gladly do forever
Just to have the stage ( look at me I'm important!!)
  With no conscience whatsoever .. it's your religion
Nor anything to show but copy paste and hunches ..and conceptual errors .


Like a heckler on the other side of the barrier at a construction job site ( build topics) ..yelling instructions in another tongue .


A Martyr too ..
Actually unfortunately you are not unique in this Free Energy research field
There are plenty of others too ( doing this for decades ..no end in sight )
Time bandits
—///———-
Here,

Another offer ..since you seem to have unlimited time and Zeal , to fill forum with your concrete Whims ..


Put a budget to a build ( you say you lack resources)
make a presentation and your expectations ,


Start a build topic .. I had asked you many times before ,
( a self runner here would be easy for you it seems ( mechanical ( or anything at all)


This forum has many open source builders in the wings ..
Incredibly skilled with similar piles of failed builds !
As mentioned by DogOne ( me too ... just not a sea container full)


Pick something and we will try to get you whatever resources you lack .
TEACH
100% serious offer
Please make your presentation.
Sincerely
Chet

[Willy]

Since he (presumably so called mod) bans me and deletes my posts at Holcomb thread, i am replying here. I have done nothing wrong, i shared more valuable and illuminating stuff than most if not all here, therefore, since i know my hands are clean, i will not be silenced. BTW i got many more accounts and will make as many as needed, and if they really insist on silencing me, there are methods to take further measures.

Starting you own topics is simple.

[kolbacict]

Well, I'll make a perpetual motion machine, let's say. What's the point?
I'll only get myself into trouble.  You won't take me  anyway.
I have long understood that there is little sense from it.
At best, if it has enough power for practical use,
put it in the basement and use it yourself.
Он нафиг никому не нужен.(OU)