Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor

[hartiberlin]

Hi ZPE ( Darren) many thanks for the insights,
please go ahead and post the sims, when they are done !
Many thanks.

Here is something, user EMdevices posted,
which I think is until now the  best explanation for the scopeshots we have seen:


Hellow Everyone,

Wow, I don't check the forum for a day and things change 180 degrees. Don't get drunk Rich, not good for you

Please everyone,
let's not jump to conclusions. John, you've done good work, don't give up.

You might have missed this picture I put up, somebody didn't like it and thought it was confusing, but I received PMs telling me it was great. Not sure if you saw it John.

Remember, Mike said he started with your original circuits. Which means.....

... THE BOTTOM END OF THE MAIN COIL IS CONNECTED TO THE BRIDGE.

I'm just amazed so many people are going round and round in circles. Look at the photos, his coil wires are closely interwined if not even TOUCHING. I think Mike had the common sense to understand that. Also do people know what happens to a reverse biased semiconductor junction? What it behaves like? Stephan, good point about the integrated diode, I have some transistors that have that in them.

Now let me repeat, THE BIG SPIKE DOWNWARD ACROSS THE SOLID STATE RELAY, IS THE MAIN WINDING VOLTAGE, VISIBLE ONLY WHEN THE SWITCH IS CONNECTED AND THE DIODE BLOCKING. It's a floating voltage. Look at the offset. Do a circuit analysis for pete's sake. (or john's and Rich's sake LOL )

Ok, let's persevere. I'll post some interesting stuff soon. I got some solid state stuff to work


Sincerely,

EM

[z_p_e]

I'd like to go on record by pointing out that IF Mike DID NOT use any trickery or fakery to get the motor to run as shown in his video, then he has overunity.

AND;

Having said that, and IF (hopefully when) the ou mechanism is discovered, the model I have presented here paves the way for a "solid state", i.e. "motionless" version of the Mike-modified BCWM.

It's simply a quad-filar, loosely-coupled air-core transformer. Add a sinewave generator to Drive L4 and a schmidt-trigger/solid-state switch combination to switch in the "ou" from D2, and there you have it.

A battery is used to start the device. i.e. charge the cap, and once the oscillator and switches begin working, the battery could be disconnected.

Darren

[z_p_e]

Stefan,

I'd like to comment on EM's post, and no disrespect to him, but to be honest, I can't really make heads nor tails of what he is saying, nor what the point is he is trying to make.

EM, are you here?

Regards,
Darren

[neptune]

Hi, is anyone else having problems with access to gnOsis.com or is it just me? Can anyone come up with a link that works?

[hotspringstrading]

Just a note that may already have been done.

The induction of the main coil  when the feild colapses back into the coil is feed through the NPN transistor as a diode and the bias resistor. This is the main diferance in the original design. The induction timing due to this is were coil three and the switch come into play.
It is also the reason the NPN burnt out.

Hope this helps folks.