Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor

[dingbat]

I'm not sure where this came from, but here's a quote from Mike seemingly stating the opposite:

It was in Mikes post of 2007-02-15 22:05 on the gn0sis.com board.  It was the post with the "D2" scope shots, as you indicate.

Second post on this page:

http://www.gn0sis.com/component/option,com_joomlaboard/Itemid,42/func,view/id,2236/catid,41/limit,20/limitstart,360/

[z_p_e]

Hi DB.

Thanks. Yeah I know the post came from gn0sis. I don't know however where the notion came from that the motor didn't work again.

Darren

[dingbat]

I recently went back and reviewed all of Mikes posts in the gn0sis.com forum.  It was very interesting.  I find his posts to be almost more credible than his video.  If the guy was a fake, he did an incredible job of being believable.

If you go back and look through all of his posts, you get the feeling that the guy just stumbled on to something and was doing his best to share what he had done.  Compare his posts to those of John Bedini, or the posts in the Steven Marks thread.  There is no comparison.  Mike seemed to do everything he could to answer questions, help document, etc.  The attitude of those who claim to be "masters" is completely different.  They try to make puzzles and riddles out of every little thing, then they tell you they are doing it for your benefit.  I really don't get it. (I think I do get it, but I don't think it needs to be spelled out here.)

DB

[acp]

Dingbat, great post. Yes, it seems to me that Mike was genuine. I too hate the "come on, jump through the hoops" attitude of the so called masters.

regards

Albert

[Peterae]

I ve found another wire, it now appears he got a wire running off M+ and M-.
Dont take this diagram as correct, its what i see when i follow the wires in the film,and they are very hard to see.