IMPORTANT - key ingrediant for a working TPU

[turbo]

Title: Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
Post by: Freedomfuel on April 13, 2006, 05:40:48 PM
________________________________________
On March the 20th Kosh may have quoted the valve textbook when he wrote about how mechanical damage occurs to filaments of valves due to a reaction force being developed between the current and the Earth?s magnetic field.  This is hardly overunity as the energy is supplied by the current source and not the Earth?s magnetic field.  Energy can be supplied by the Earth?s magnetic field but in this example I believe that it  cannot be explained by standard electrical engineering theory involving cutting lines of flux.  Rather the Earth?s magnetic field should be seen as mediating in the exchange of energy between the Earth and the Sun.  I have concluded that the Earth does not directly receive much EM radiation from the Sun, but rather packets of magnetic energy in the form of source free magnetic vortices are trapped by the Earth's magnetic field which acts as a vast solar energy collector.  How light, heat and other EM radiation could be formed can be demonstrated by considering the luminous effects that occur when UFOs take off.  UFOs utilize counter rotating magnet assemblies like the Mikell device and as these spin faster a range of colours is seen culminating in white.  In fact the whole spectrum of EM radiation is emitted as air atoms are ionized and excited.  Once they observed this the black project scientists understood how the Sun really generates EM radiation - not from nuclear fusion but rather from turbulence in it's magnetic field interacting with it's atmosphere.  In support of this hypothesis is the fact that the planets with considerable magnetic fields also have luminous atmospheres.  The Sun has the most powerful magnetic field and also the most luminous atmosphere.

The hypothesis I have put forward at this forum is that free energy devices pump the ionosphere until a resonance is achieved with a magnetic vortex directing these magnetic particles back to the device as a magnetic current or 'cold electricity'.  The curious thing about the Mark device is that it appears to output RF current judging by the flame like discharge made by a short circuit shown in the video.  This suggests that there is more than one way of extracting energy from the ionosphere.  You ought to carefully study this paper that puts forward the hypothesis that it is possible to pump the ionophere with verticaly reflecting antennas to obtain RF energy:

RF Energy via Solar/Ionospheric Resonance
http://home.netcom.com/~sbyers11/RFenergy_iono.htm

Byers has put forward the hypothesis that the ionosphere acts as a massive solar energy collector which can be stimulated with RF emissions to reflect energy back to a transmitter using a technique similar to Masers.  Atoms in the ionosphere are ionized by solar UV photons and put into a higher higher energy state which represents stored solar energy.  He proposes a system whereby a source of RF energy can be amplified by the stimulated emission of photons of the same frequency and phase as the source as these excited atoms drop to lower energy levels.  Since the ionosphere reflects radio waves there would be a frequency at which standing waves would developed inside this resonant cavity and feedback would lead to amplified coherent radiation within it.  The flaw with this proposal is that the frequency of the hyperfine structure of air atoms would be in the gighertz range which would require a cavity much smaller than that between the Earth and the ionosphere.  However, Byers does support his hypothesis with a spectrum analyzer graph of an ionosounding test which shows a resonance at 5.456 Mhz with a broad sholder of stimulated emissins from 5.3 Mhz to 6 Mhz.

Another paper worth studying is this one from the Swedish Institiute Of Space Physics:

Stimulated Electromagnetic Emissions
http://www.physics.irfu.se/SEE/

This paper describes experiments in which powerful radio transmitters were used to induce turbulence in the ionosphere and study wave-plasma interactions.  The electric field component of the radio wave induces variations in the electron density at intervals of one wavelength resulting in longitudinal waves called Langmuir waves.  Part of the incident wave is reflected back at a higher frequency implying an energy gain since the energy of a wave is proportional to it's frequency.  Here is an interesting quote that may have some relevence to the Mark device:

'The pump waves used in the experiments were circularly polarised and depending on the direction of rotation of the field components, clockwise (ordinary) or anticlockwise (extraordinary) the effect could or could not be observed. This indicated that the magnetic field was an important contributor to the observed scattering effect.'

We know that the Mark device emits a rotating wave because the correct orientation of the coil depends on which hemisphere the device is located at.  This can be explained by the Coriolis effect.  This is the apparant deflection of a moving object in a rotating frame of reference such as, in this case, the Earth's magnetic field.  The analogy might not be valid because the Mark coil does not look much like a radio antenna, but I could be wrong.

Another way in which the Earth's magnetic field could be a source of energy could be connected with the action of solar electrons trapped in the torroidal Van Allen radiation belts.  The Earth's magnetic field bend the paths of charges so that they move perperdiculary to the field lines, i. e. in circles or spirals around the field lines, of which the frequency depends on the charge and the mass of the particle in question. Since these circulating electrons accelerate towards the centre of their motion they emit radio waves called 'cyclotron radiation'  Pump waves corresponding in frequency to this cyclotron radiation electrons tend to further accelerate the gyro motion, just like a forced harmonic oscillator.
I do not know if any of this is really relevant to understanding the Mark device but it may point the way to further research.  Here are some links you may find useful for background reading
:
Magnetic Fields Of the Planets
http://www.es.ucl.ac.uk/research/planetaryweb/undergraduate/dom/magrev/magtoc.htm

Living Reviews In Solar Physics
http://solarphysics.livingreviews.org/

The Sun's Magnetic Field
http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/solarmag.html

Magnetism Is Key To Mystery Of the Sun
http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/magmyst.html

Do magnetic waves heat the solar atmosphere?
http://academic.evergreen.edu/z/zita/talks/2003Portland/03APS.ppt

Mikell Device
http://www.fdp.nu/mikelldevice/thedevice.asp

Magnetic Energy To Heal the Planet
http://www.magneticenergy.co.uk

http://www.geocities.com/magneticdiscoveryclub

[Bruce_TPU]

Hmmmm.....

Sounds like he was on the tract that BEP, myself and others have been discussing.

Good confirmation we might be headed in the right direction.

Cheers,
Bruce

[Grumpy]

In summary:

RMF

Boyce has this in his device too, as did MArinov's MAGVID and numerous other devices...

The effects that occur at higher frequencies of rotation - the phase change - the uncurling of the field (which probably pisses it right off) - time dilation - temperature variations - the shearing and skewing of the torison field with the magnetic - make your hair stand on end...

@-[MARCO]-
the three individual segments will produce a varation in phase by their position - much like a great number of poles - might want to fire that one back up with a true mobius core rather than bifilar cancelling...

EDIT:
(more post from Freedomfuel on OUPoer.com)
http://oupower.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=124

EDIT:
http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:weEsQKEFBioJ:amasci.com/freenrg/tors/tors24.html+rotating+torsion+field&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us

Freedomfuel mention some excerpts from Wilbert Smith's "The New Science" which introduces "tempic" fields and their relationship to electric and magnetic fields (Google it).  Tempic is same as torsion and same as scalar terms - they do not cancel out but add.  Some have connected torsion fields to neutrinos, but who knows.  Neutrinos have spin and magnetic moment, but no charge.

http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:mkuNkF1OB0QJ:amasci.com/freenrg/tors/tors3.html+rotating+torsion+field&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:amG8IUuea_IJ:amasci.com/freenrg/tors/doc17.html+Yurovitsky+magnetic+field+generators&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us

[z_p_e]

Nice range of posts from Freedomfuel.

I remember reading some of them way back. The guy has a good brain, that's for sure. Too bad he "lost it" at the end though.

Darren

[turbo]

@-[MARCO]-
the three individual segments will produce a varation in phase by their position - much like a great number of poles - might want to fire that one back up with a true mobius core rather than bifilar cancelling...

the coil i am building has no mobius nor bifilar coils.

M.