Otto`s replication of Steven Mark`s TPU

[z_p_e]

OK, since you seem serious and passionate about the TPU, I'll throw out a little insight.

You don't get something for nothing.

The original prototypes SM developed, used batteries to power the controller.

Later, they achieved equal success apparently without the use of a battery...yes the swipe of the magnet. There is rumour or speculation however that this was only an activating mechanism, and in fact, watching the videos, I believe there is at least one unit that operates without a magnet.

We also know that the magnet is not necessary for the device to operate.

Regardless if a battery is used or if initial power is furnished by the induction caused by the swiped magnet, the controller circuit requires power to operate...all the time.

Power can be supplied either by a battery, or by feeding back a portion of the output. At the very least, initial external power is required to get the device operating. Again, the initial external power is furnished via a battery or magnetic induction. After the device exceeds unity, it can then furnish its own input power, and the battery can be disconnected.

Bottom line is there is ALWAYS an input power required to operate the TPU.

Since there is an INPUT and an OUTPUT power that can be measured, the COP can easily be calculated.

Darren

[otto]

Hello all

@Mr.Mannix

thanks.

Otto

[chrisC]

Darren:

I knew that much about the initial versions having a battery as SM's post specifically mentioned that. Now the real question I'm sure that even you would need to face reality is that whatever battery was used, the continuously useful power isn't coming from the battery once the 'process' is activated. Yeh or Nay?

That's all. No more.

Peace

chrisC

[z_p_e]

Darren,
Im surprised!

The efforts that you put into the spinning magnet game was astounding  you do see some similar things with that control coil....you have so much to offer here, why do you share your doubt? Who does it serve?

Lindsay

Lindsay, you know I have no doubt SM's TPU is authentic.

I am simply questioning one's interpretation of SM's work, as I see some flaws and assumptions. I am attempting to bring some objectivity to this group as well, as sometimes things seem to get a little out of hand. But this of course is just my opinion.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion and to question another's work, and I expect the same would happen if I posted a design here as well. I believe I would be much better prepared though to answer those questions.

No one truly knows what comprises SM's design Lindsay, not even yourself. Steven and UEC may be the only ones that do, and unless they come forward with the design, we will never know with 100% certainty we've got it, even if ou is achieved.

Regards,
Darren

[z_p_e]

Darren:

I knew that much about the initial versions having a battery as SM's post specifically mentioned that. Now the real question I'm sure that even you would need to face reality is that whatever battery was used, the continuously useful power isn't coming from the battery once the 'process' is activated. Yeh or Nay?

That's all. No more.

Peace

chrisC

Chris,

Go back and read my post again. Your answer is and was already there.

Darren