Chas Campbell free power motor

[ltseung888]

See Slide 16 of
http://www.energyfromair.com/beijing/taiwan2a.htm.

See also the post at:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2794.msg44047.html#msg44047

We know that the Chas Campbell Motor is a gravity machine because we saw and explained something similar at Tsing Hua Unversity in October 2006.  We used the Lee-Tseung theory to explain the source of energy.

Chas Campbell could increase the efficiency via the use of Cylinders instead of the flywheels.

Lawrence Tseung
Discussion of the Chas Campbell machine Leads Out Memories of the Tsing Hua Electricity Magnifier.

[hartiberlin]

@Humbugger:
You miss the point.
For instance you can buy a Griggs Hydrosonic pump and it is a confirmed overunity heating system with a COP of 1.5.
You can take a hot shower in the Alabama Fire department for instance, where it is installed and saves them money by heating their water...
Back to Chas:
His device works probably simular to a Bessler Wheel using and converting gravity and centrifugal forces.
I hope Ashtweth can soon see the machibe in person and can take new videos.

[Humbugger]

Blind belief in unsubstantiated claims and silly theories leads out endless wasted time and effort from naive followers.

A total lack of critical thinking skills mixed with many competing neurotic egos leads out a huge public body of false-knowledge and delusion.

Bad science taught by posing gurus leads out confused believers who will never succeed in accomplishing real progress.

Skepticism leads out critical thinking skills from intelligent beings.

Skepticism leads out anger and hatred from blind believers.

[Dingus Mungus]

LOL! All hail humbugger...
WOW if only someone would have come sooner to warn me!
Now I'm free to watch dancing with the stars like most Americans...



Do you really believe your the first skeptic goon to show up here???

You must be dense... LOL!

There are lots of silly FOS guru's running around here, and their theories are crap, that much I agree with. Overunity on the other hand, has been achieved in over a dozen technologies. All overunity means is more output than user input. We've been over this before and Stephan has also explained it to you... So of course the science community claims there are no overunity devices. Every time a new OU device is discovered, once we understand where the excess FREE energy is coming from, the total FE devices number returns to zero again. Hence we're hunting for CoP>1 or the "holy grail" which is excess energy that can not be explained.

I hope you at least consider doing some experiments if you plan on hanging around for any prolonged ammount of time.

~Dingus Mungus

[Humbugger]

@Humbugger:
You miss the point.
For instance you can buy a Griggs Hydrosonic pump and it is a confirmed overunity heating system with a COP of 1.5.
You can take a hot shower in the Alabama Fire department for instance, where it is installed and saves them money by heating their water...
Back to Chas:
His device works probably simular to a Bessler Wheel using and converting gravity and centrifugal forces.
I hope Ashtweth can soon see the machibe in person and can take new videos.

Stefan,

Show me a Bessler Wheel that spins on its own indefinitely and from which useful energy can be drawn.  The physics of heat pumps are well known and well understood, as is the source of their output energy.  They do not defy any of the basic laws of thermodynamics.

Why would you, who seem like an intelligent man, give the same credence to a Bessler Wheel (every attempt at which has failed to spin on its own or provide useful output) and things like Meheer's motor (which was the most absolutely clear and transparent case of self-delusion due to bad science I've seen here yet) with machines that are well within classic physics, like the heat pump?

Could it be that you encourage every idea equally without applying critical thinking in order to grow a larger and more profitable website?  Is it really thought of as a crime here to be critical of obviously foolish ideas?

I applaud your endeavor and, obviously I find it interesting.  If you are trying to build a knowledge base, however, it would behoove you to encourage an atmosphere of actual scientific approach, including good hard logical intelligent skepticism where it is called for and possibly some effort to help users learn the basics of the electronics and physics laws they are trying so hard to defy.

I don't see how it benefits the effort toward achieving energy revolution by encouraging people to rebuild over and over ideas that have been shown both by scientific analysis and by prior cut and try methods not to work.  I guess, however, if you eliminated all the thinly-disguised variations on ridiculously futile themes, there would not be much left here though, would there?