The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

[jacob]

Hello Wattsup,

@All

OK, here it is, the CBC-V2.0. I will eventually put up the revised build spec on this one.

I finally decided to keep the whole thing untapped. This way I can try different primary coil lengths by just rolling them on a separate rod and then simply slipping them onto the core.

The present Primary has 35 turns. The secondaries in this picture are connected in the cross mode.

Thus far, nothing special to report. Same old same old...

Are you saying that you are witnessing the same behaviour you  witnessed with your first built, and can you please describe this behaviour.

Thanks.

Jacob

[wattsup]

@jacob

Give me a few more days to do some varied testing under different Trial numbers, but so far nothing special.

Looking at Brnbrades' CBC, I noticed that the elevation between the secondary wind and the primary wind is more accentuated than mine, and cannot be explained by his taped exterior. Is it possible that his primary was two layers and he did not mention this. Or is it possible that the primary is wound like a two layer mobius. 

Something like what EM put up on the Inside Coil thread linked below but not in the knotted fashion shown in his diagram. Or it might have been in Ottos threads.;
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3279.msg49393.html#msg49393

Also, if you look at Brnbrades core diameter and then the secondary diameter winding, the difference is also more accentuated then my current builds. Using the alu-varnish really cut down on the diameter of the total CBC considerably, so maybe he is using a dual winding secondary also.

Last thing is I will remove the alu varnish that is still coating the end of each of my coils. Maybe this is also an important aspect of releasing a magnetic field via each end.

Anyways, further testing is required for sure.

[BEP]

I mentioned a slit. I believe someones else did also.

Mine was with the thought this may be an oscillator form of magnetic amplifier. The opposing slits on different layers of aluminum with a coil between would function this way. It did when an active device was driving it (transitor). It even created some alternate bucking and boosting when DC was fed in one end and a 100W 120VAC lamp on the other end.

The results were interesting but far from self-running. The only thing that seemed unique was the coils were sensitive to local magnetic fields. When my bench fan was running I had a hard time getting any activity. When the fan was off - DC into one end with the lamp load - I got a definite 7.5kHz pulse. The DC component matched the power supply output. The pulses were nearly square wave, uniform with an amplitude of 63VDC.

So all I proved was it could work as a bucking magnetic amplifier/oscillator without an active device. I quit when the load current exceeded my puny wires and shorted them.

Since I couldn't get Al varnish I tried encapsulating the inner winding with AL. This was done by wrapping the foil onto the rod - then copper winding (with uninsulated aluminum wire between each turn and a coil unto itself but unterminated). This AL wire was shorted to the lower and covering AL layer. So basically the copper winding was encapsulated with AL along it entire length.

By running current through the AL from one end to the other and then reversing the polarity I could control the current flow through the copper winding. Fun but no use found yet.

[scotty1]

Hi all...just thought i'd post this as Bep mentioned it...
This is the original diagram that Cook used for his patent. He just added another one. 
It comes from a magnetizm manual from 1857, so they were using some form of covering for the wires back then.
Scotty

[wattsup]

@scotty1

Where did you find this? On the net? If yes, where please.