Spinor resonance -- explanation for TPU like devices

[Omega_0]

Hi Mark,

Good to see you here. I was pleasantly surprised to see your posts here and discovering your 'hidden' personality
I used to post on cgtalk where I remember I had some interaction with you on general forum. I was drawn to this 'free energy' stuff through cgtalk itself, when I saw a thread on Steorn last year. Now I'm hooked. I do post there on cgtalk but very rarely nowadays. (I don't want to reveal my cgtalk handle here because people can easily see who I'm through my cg portfolio. LOL)

Your theories regarding particles being an aspect of spacetime geometry are fascinating. I think its time to get rid of "four fundamental forces" view now, its getting stale. Your posts remind me of vortex theory of electrons/particles, where electrons are pictured as tiny vortices in the dense and fine Aether. They are 'spinning nothings'. There are more theories of there being different kinds of spacetimes too, but these are too far out there.

It also reminds me of Dr Evan's work. I guess you must be already familiar with it. (Website and blog). He speaks of magnetic field being a torsion in spacetime (gravity being a simple compression). He also spoke of the Mexican group and their FE tech. He supports his theory with mathematics and has derived some fundamental equations from it. So all very similar to what you say.

I believe, rotating magnetic fields are a doorway to antigravity. Some configuration of magnetic fields moving in a certain way would produce a geometry of spacetime which mimics gravity. The similarity between equations describing gravity and magnetism are blindingly obvious. ( see Gravitomagnetism). There has to be some way of doing it. I don't know yet of course

Now some more interesting stuff. Few days back I did a simulation in 3ds max, of magnetism. I used the 'Wind' force built in max for this, nothing else. From the one end of a box, the wind (spherical) flows out and at the other end one more instance of the wind flows in. There are two particles that are bound to these Wind forces. When you move the dummy around the 'Magnet' you can see that it very closely resembles a compass needle interacting with a magnet. You can move/rotate the magnet around in the view port to see more magnet like behavior, e.g. like poles repelling and unlike one's attracting. All with two Wind objects, nothing more. I'm attaching the file here, it opens with 3ds max 9.

I'm trying to improve it more, via scripting etc. If you can provide any tips, please do. I'll later try to create systems and assemblies and also some real models to see how accurately the 'Wind simulation' predicts.

[MarkSnoswell]

@Omega_1

Hi -- I'll bite my tounge and not use your real name -- good to see you here.

This is *just* one aspect of my nature -- so little time and so much to do

I can't run the simulations -- don't know whats wrong - tried opening it in max 9. If you want to exchange more max stuff then better do it by PM. I am trying to keep the thread generic and understandable to as many people as possible.

I do have a 3ds Max pluging that creats spinors (single and dual) -- I may consider sharing it with a few beta testers. If anyone is interested PM or email me -- it only runs on 3ds max 9. I plan to do a dirext X version at some stage.


Even if you cant follow it all I recommend anyone to take a look at this Quaternionic Electrodynamics http://static.scribd.com/docs/4vugu5b3zvfo8.pdf

I also reccommend Doug Sweesters excellent material at http://world.std.com/~sweetser/quaternions/qindex/qindex.html

And if everyone hasn't looked already there is Professor Hansons work on Visualising Quaternions at http://books.elsevier.com/companions/0120884003/vq/index.html
(my work goes way beyond this but it's not published)

Oh -- and really great general site for maths and all things relevant is Martin Bakers Euclidianspace -- here is the stuff on Spinors http://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/algebra/groups/spinor/index.htm
on Quaternions http://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/algebra/realNormedAlgebra/quaternions/index.htm
and on Clifford Maths -- a must read http://www.euclideanspace.com/maths/algebra/clifford/index.htm

While I am doing references Tony Smith has a truly excellent collection of material and theories that are well worth the time to look over http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/TShome.html
just download his book and go over it offline.

Myron Evans and thae AIAS -- very familar. There are many errors in Myrons 'papers' that he refuses to discuss with anyone. He does not add anything to the area that others have not already done and done better. The "Mexican Device" Evans talks about is the one I went to Mexico to see... it is my opinion that it's basd on the same principals as the TPU, although it's a lot more advanced.

See the Roger Penrose Twistor Theory here http://universe-review.ca/R15-19-twistor.htm

cheers

Mark.

[Motorcoach1]

mm sorry Dr Snoswel i posted a photo of my small torroid months ago on a bi stable coil with a ring inside and manix shows up with an image with a cit=rcut  mmmm don't do 3 off theses , drop a ball bearing ing the middel at the right freq and it might dissapeiear,,,,

[MarkSnoswell]

AH -- what the heck... Here are two configurations that I came up with a while ago to create spin resonators.

To be clear -- these are concepts that I came up with completly independantly from any "detective" or replication work. I devised these entierly based on my work on quaternion spinors.

I dont know if this would work -- they are just concepts. However I put them up here as they seem to have a great deal in common with things being discussed. However -- look **caerfully at the winding directions. There are aspects to these that differ significantly from what people are discussing and from what classical experience would suggest **note the counter wound arangements.

cheers

Mark.

[eldarion]

By the way, I had that same replicator run a test by installing a DC blocking capacitor in series with a 120 volt load, raise the DC bias potential, and watch the output climb while no additional load was placed on the power supply. I think he finally may have learned something about the potential of DC potential ;-)

Bob,

Could you elaborate a bit more on that setup?  Was the additional power drawn from the DC bias supply, or did more power appear from nowhere?  Could I get a crude schematic of the experiment?

Thanks!

Eldarion