Spinor resonance -- explanation for TPU like devices

[MarkSnoswell]

In answer to a private question about one of the many alternate views on how things waor I was prompted to scribe the following...

I have seen lots of theories and talk about how things really work and how classical and quantum theories are wrong. Most of the proponents of these new theories are just looking at phenomenon and merely rearranging current concepts attempting to find a better fit. I got tired of this approach and decided to *really* start from scratch.... asking questions like what constitutes a universe? What constitutes a dimension? Can we have fractional dimensions?

I am still on the journey and I have just arrived at 3+1 = 4 dimensions. What I have discovered so far is that all you need is a consistent 3 dimensional fabric (universe ? nodes and connections in a 3D plank length mesh) that has a tendency to uniformity and finite propagation speed ? with just this you appear to get everything. I discovered that awkward concepts like relativity became a simple (trivial in fact) consequence of a finite propagation speed. The real eye opener was the fundamental types of oscillation that become possible as you increase integer dimensions:

1(2) dimensions ? longitudinal oscillations.    Complex.
2(3) dimensions ? longitudinal + transverse oscillations.    not consistent ?
3(4) dimensions ? longitudinal + transverse + spin.    Quaternion.
4(5) dimensions - longitudinal + transverse + spin + hyper-spin.    not consistent?
...
7( 8 ) dimensions ? 7 oscillation types.    Octonion.

(Time) is a dimension in the above ? I find it usefull to think of time as finite propagation speed or even just as a consequence of a perfect integer dimension... I know that sounds out there ? I suspect that it?s one of those things that you just never completely get until you derive it for yourself. I don?t think expressing it in mathematical terms (even if I could) would help; you?d just have to learn the same concepts except with the added layer of formal mathematical abstraction... anyway... Including the ?time? dimension you get the dimensions in brackets above.

To be fair what I refer to as a ?tendency to uniformity? really has to be considered a dimension from the point of independent parameters that determine our universe. However it is really no different than stating there is a finite propagation speed ? these things reduce to the same thing and are what we call ?time?. If I am failing to make this clear that because it?s such a fundamental expansion to the intuitive concept of time -- a much richer understanding. Time = finite propagation = restoring force = tendency to uniformity = self consistent integer dimension universe. ... different words: same thing.

I also put the names of the maths for rotations in the above list ? complex numbers are two dimensional circular numbers. Quaternions are 4 dimensional circular numbers and Octionions are 8 dimensional circular numbers. By circular I mean that they are periodic == their major number axis runs in a circle (hypercircle etc) ? whereas the real number axis is linear (well actually it?s often better to think of it as circular but on an circle of infinite radius).

What is interesting is that only 2, 4 and 8  (possibly 16 dimensions but that?s arguable)  dimensional number systems work consistently in this manner. This is the same sort of thing as only the integer dimensions working in that they are internally consistent and support time. I mention this because it is possible that we live in an 8 dimensional universe and not a 4 ? there are a number of researches who believe this to be the case. I don?t yet have a clear opinion on that ? I am still grappling with the wonderful complexity that springs from 4 dimensional space and spin oscillations which can be described by quaternion maths...

Where I am at now is visualising how spinors interact ? I think of electric gradients as not just spin gradients but the separation of two opposite spinners. This leads to some startling conclusions that appear, when you get your head around them, to fit a lot of the unusual behaviour that Tesla and other since have struggled with... and I don?t just mean fit, I mean *explain*. I suspect there is a lifetime of results to flow from just this little area without ever needing to go to higher dimensions and more exotic theories. I have been astounded over the past two weeks just how many things have fitted together... ideas I have predicted that turn out to have multiple experimental validations.

These are exciting times indeed.

cheers

mark.

I'll post some graphics to make up for all these words next time

[MarkSnoswell]

People are always talking about tetrahedrons and their unique properties...

...so here is a little eyecandy to make people think. Apart from being the platonic solid for 3 dimentions they have some interesting symetries when you add the 4th dimention in the manner shown here... Take a *very* close look at the symetries -- they are not what most people expect!

cheers

mark.

The title for the still is not correct it's not a borromean linkage -- dont miss the animation which is correctly labeled!

[Grumpy]

Wilbert Smith had a nice way of explaining things.

http://www.rexresearch.com/smith/newsci~1.htm

He devided the universe into 4 fabrics of 3 parameters each:

From Wilbert Smith - "The New Science"
Four fabrics of three parameters (dimensions) resulting in a total of 12 parameters

The Four Fabrics:
1. Space fabric
2. field fabric
3. control fabric
4. percipitation fabric

The 12 paramters arranged by their fabrics:

1. Space fabric parameters
  a. length
   b. area
   c. volume
2. Field fabric parameters
  a. Density (gradient) (scalar) (change) (Tempic (torsion or spin) field)
   b. Divergence (stable condition) (vector and scalar)(Electric field)
   c. Curl (2 vectors and scalar)(deviation)(dynamic) (Magnetic field)
(complete quadrature freedom between space and field means that we work in a 6 dimensional continuum consisting of the space and field frabrics)
3. Control fabric parameters
   a. orientation (mag field orientation is random)
(only 7 parameters required to study a single particle ? the others are required to do something to the particle)
   b. decision (free will)
   c. Sequence (order or specific arrangement ? establishes symmetry)
4. Perception fabric parameters (subject to modification by Awareness)
   a. form (boundary of reality)
   b. Multiplicity (more than one form is established)
   c. Aggregation (assembly of bits into a Purposeful Structure)

Time is the gradient of spin.

The fields are only a subset of the parameters and inadequate to define the universe.

We are as much a part of our universe as it is a part of us.

EDIT:

Dave Lowrance has studied the work of Wilbert Smith and performed man experiments.

Dave's page on the Control Fabric with images: http://magnetism.otc.co.nz/ControlFabric.htm

Study will show that the Work of Dave and Wilbert Smith can be correlated to that of Walter Russell. 

Time flow rate - or rate of entropy - increases with density.  So, by increasing pressure, or torsion, we increase density and the rate of time flow or entropy.

[BEP]

@Mark,

I would like to see a scope tied to that! Always 6 fields cancelling out while also amplifying the other six fields.

Probably has virtual control over position of nodes just by adjusting phase relationship between coils. Charge position control? I can't even picture the creation and movement of vortices. Infinite inductance? The reason 720 degrees must be understood in spinor rotation?

A circle isn't really 360 degrees - is it?

[not_a_mib]

It is only a matter of time until someone posts this link.
http://ridinspinors.ytmnd.com/