EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it

[chrisC]

Hi brnbrade:

What's that smile? Any messages for us?

Thanks
chrisC

[archon79]

I believe that SM's original TPU is a legit device, but you just can not trust any video source even if there are no wires.

You only have to go to youtube and watch some videos by David Blaine and Cris Angel to see what can be done with illusionist tricks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRMHmnr4b60&mode=related&search=

[wattsup]

@Brnbrade

How are you? We are trying hard. But we also like to fool around.

@EMdevices

EM - Incredible!!!

I posted the following on July 09, 2007, 03:32:01 PM

and here it already is. Like I was rubbing a genie bottle or something.

And six days after, abracadabra, poof.  My wish is granted.

Just incredible!

Here is maybe a very dumb question but for me it will help in seeing the future.

OK, Otto and Ronotte are testing using three mosfet/driver combos. What I would like to know is where in SM's devices do you think he had such components, the heat sinks, the  power supply to the mosfets, the heat generated, the noise, etc. Or can the mosfets/driver combos be made much much smaller in the future. But then how was it possible in 1997. Or is this question taboo? Or we are all right to agree Otto's device is not a TPU but a new power generator called the ECD?

I am also thinking that to build a TPU, maybe it is best to start building a fake one, same look, same performance but with any type of internal power source exciting any form of coil system possible to achieve the end result, that is to light or half light one, two or more bulbs for the same time as on the demos, that could be officially determined. Once this is achieved, then work backwards to work out the autonomous features.  You can put a limit on the internal battery to output ratio or only have the limitation of weight and practical size/shape and see what type of ideas can be hatched. I am sure there are some others here that would be interested in taking up such a challenge and it would be helpful to the builders. Maybe start a new craze. Maybe even launch a new contest. Who can build the best working replica, regardless of power source? Maybe even outsource it to China. They are so good at copying things fast and cheap.

[innovation_station]

hello all if in fact this tpu does work as in the vidieos i will find out i am just collecting the rest of the tools to test this properly just got my scope today finally and a freq gen soon but it will be tubes and i will see what i can do with all of this and with some luck i think i can make it work so off i will go to play and stock up on materials

i truly beleave this works verry well and safe

steven marks if you read this  -------------we will get it all figured out yet and i plan on helping

the best to all

ist

[xilusma]

@EM,

Good to see your bulb light up.  . Looking forward for more. Any recipe that you could shared with me (if the others don't want it). Because mine still don't go to the Ampere as yet. Mine only mil Ampere. But let me say this, it is one worth of knowledge/technology to be shared off (if you permitted so).

@ALL,

A note to wonder - Just imagine, if a device (light,small and portable)  - even if we still uses battery (or any other type of power source) and could produce 100% or more of real workable output, that would mean something. The achievement is very big.

I think, before we could get the OU running (someday) , the above knowledge shouldn't be throw away just like that.

Regards,