The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

Sharing the USA contact information

I am now ready to share with the World the person from USA whom I shall be working with.  He is Major Todd Hathaway.  The resume and background information is in the attached files.  His wife is Nora Maccoby who is well known in the Alternative Energy Area.  Nora led a team of energy experts to China in 2005 and met many important Chinese Officials.

Nora just gave an interview about her work:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5009439800283450862 - low resolution version

www.green-salon.com/nora_2007-12-10.wmv is the large video file - have to download to watch.

I shall be delighted to work with Todd and Nora.  There may be more knowledgeable persons from China and other Countries.  Together we are in a much better position to benefit the World.

Lawrence Tseung
Coming out into the Open helps to bring World Peace and Prosperity.

I sure hope the major reads these posts before he comes. Maybe he'll change his mind once he discovers he's going to Hong Kong to see a comedy show, or was a Peking Opera where the main character talks to himself all the time and also plays multiple personalities?

cheers
chrisC

[nightlife]

chrisC, this is actually a good idea but I think his would consume more power then is really needed. The more I think about it the more ideas I get.

The downward flow could be restricted by reducing the pipe size which would create a powerful pressure to turn turbans faster.

I am sure this has already been thought of but again, we would never know about it do to big money.

[Evil Roy Slade]

The downward flow could be restricted by reducing the pipe size which would create a powerful pressure to turn turbans faster.

I believe the Arabians  have done alot of work in this area.

ERS

[shruggedatlas]

The downward flow could be restricted by reducing the pipe size which would create a powerful pressure to turn turbans faster.

Humorous spelling aside, you are rehashing some very old ideas.  What you propose would not work due to the hydrostatic paradox concept.  Only the column of water directly above an opening contributes to water pressure.  The rest of the cone would play no part.

[nightlife]

shruggedatlas, I have siphoned a lot of gas in my time and I know the if I restrict the flow with my finger, the gas will spray out at a faster rate shooter further than just letting it flow.

Take a bicycle wheel and let water come out of a unrestricted hose and see how fast the wheel turns and then restrict the flow that comes out and see how fast the wheel turns. Then do the same with siphoning water from a bucket but make sure the bucket is higher then the wheel and or opening of the tube and tell me that it has no more pressure then letting it just flow or restricting the end with your finger. The gradational pull creates a draw that makes this happen. You wont get anymore GPM but you will get more pressure.

This next video shows a good way to utilize this idea.

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=P-yM7U9w8SA

I was also thinking that the pressure created in the box could be used to pump the water back in the holding tank. I am not sure about that and it would take some experimenting to find out what the best way is.

I don?t have a clue how much pressure could be achieved but that would depend on the size of the tubing or piping used. It is a very interesting concept that has my attention.