The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[hansvonlieven]

Dear Hans,

Your water cannon Flying Saucer has been packaged as a post graduate student project proposal.  Congratulations.

You will be credited as the creator of the idea.  Do you want to get involved as an advisor?  Your posts will be carefully screened and studied.

My dear Lawrence,

I don't know too much about the education system in China but one thing I do know. If post graduate students in your country are taking my propositions in this "design" seriously your nation is in deep shit.

I seriously doubt that I would have gone past high school in Germany by subscribing to idiotic ideas such as these.

According to your "students" there are two schools of physics. I take that to mean one school is the one that has built a magnificent technology from which we all benefit and the other is the Lee-Tseung school of physics which relies on a series of half-arsed unsubstantiated postulates for its existence.

Feel free to use my "design", you can even claim it as being yours. I really would like to see a flying saucer powered by a bunch of your students pissing into the Impact Chamber and taking off to Stockholm or the Moon.

Good Luck,

Hans von Gefilte Fish

[ltseung888]

According to your "students" there are two schools of physics. I take that to mean one school is the one that has built a magnificent technology from which we all benefit and the other is the Lee-Tseung school of physics which relies on a series of half-arsed unsubstantiated postulates for its existence.

Feel free to use my "design", you can even claim it as being yours. I really would like to see a flying saucer powered by a bunch of your students pissing into the Impact Chamber and taking off to Stockholm or the Moon.

Dear Hans,

The two schools of thought from Physicists are:
(1) An enclosed system cannot change its velocity or direction with internal motion.  A plane or a rocket ejects mass (gases) and is not an enclosed system.
(2) An enclosed system can change its velocity or direction with internal motion.  Examples of internal motion include centripetal force or impact on opposite walls with different rates of  change of momentum.  The more exact physics term is "non-rigid body motion including straight line and circular motion".

Previously, the problem was not considered serious enough to pay much attention - as infinite energy from within the enclosed system was not possible.

With Over Unity inventions, (especially explained by the Lee-Tseung Theory) infinite gravitational or electron motion energy can be Lead Out.

Your water cannon Flying Saucer design will not be accepted by the first school of physicists as they blindly quote Newton's Third Law as objection.

However, the second shool of Physicists accepts that.  The US patent office already granted 91 "inertia propulsion system" inventions.  This means that the second school of Physicists have not been rejected by the US patent office.

The chance of your patent being accepted by the USA patent office is high.  I have enough patents of my own.  It is unethical and illegal to steal someone's idea.  I shall quote your name and the relevant posts in recommending the water cannon Flying Saucer as a research project in China.  If you do not object, many teams worldwide will work on it.  You are essentially giving up your patent rights (potential profit in millions).

Personally, I am 100% confident of its success.  It has advantages over the other 91 granted US patents on inertia propulsion.

You can tell your grandchildren that you have made an important contribution to the human transportation history.

[shruggedatlas]

However, the second shool of Physicists accepts that.  The US patent office already granted 91 "inertia propulsion system" inventions.  This means that the second school of Physicists have not been rejected by the US patent office.

History is full of charlatans who point to patents to bolster their claims.  Sadly, a patent is not evidence of a working device.  It is only evidence that you were able to get past the patent examiners.

Let us know when you have that flying saucer built and working, ok?

[chrisC]

....
I have enough patents of my own. ....

It's not how many patents you have. In your case, does your US patents hold water? Is the industry infringing on your claims? If not, it's just a embodiment of an idea that perhaps, no one gives a hoot about. 95% of the patents in the USPTO are not worth what the inventors paid for in patent agent resources to draft their ideas or the money paid to maintain them. That's the value of your two patents!

As to your China patents, you might as well file them on Mars. By USPTO or EU standards, your so called Chinese patent applications will end up in a trash can before they even see the first office action. Your flying saucers can be piss-powered and the Chinese patent office will accept that too. That's reality.

So, please spare us your ..."enough patents" boasting. I'm really impressed.

cheers

chrisC

[ltseung888]

Discussion amongst science students

Student A: "I would like to discuss whether a flying saucer is technically possible.  I shall restrict the discussion to
(1) Can the Flying Saucer hover in mid-air?
(2) Can it make extremely sharp turns?
(3) Can it fly to outer space?
(4) Can it fly without ejecting gases?
(5) Can it fly in any environment e.g. in air or under the ocean?"

Student B: "I would like to add that it could use infinite energy from gravity or electron motion."

Student C: ?I would like to add that it could use the physics of non-rigid body motion including straight line and circular motion.?

Student D: ?I would like to add that it could use ?inertia propulsion systems? already accepted by the USA Patent Office.?

Student A: ?It must not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.  It must not violate Newton?s Third Law ? Action equals Reaction.?