The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Koen1]

@Bill: Nah, it's not just you. It's at least me too.
Oh, and I too enjoy the fact that we can share our thoughts and opinions on this forum,
it's one of the nicer things about the global village concept. (where did that go, by the way?
like 10 years ago it was all "global village" this and "information superhighway" that...
Now it seems there's more flaming, bashing, and disinformation going on than ever...)
As for Tseung, I have clearly expressed my willingness to hear him out and follow
his reasoning, but he keeps messing things up for himself by not replying to the question,
by acting arrogant for no reason, by flooding the thread with nonsensical quasi prophetic
fantasy discussions, by constantly referring back to his old meaningless posts and claiming
that they contain the much sought after explanations which they never do,
and by never properly explaining what you ask him to explain. At some point it just gets annoying,
and if at that point he starts acting arrogant or even degrading again, I don't really find it very
surprising that people get pissed off at him.

@localjoe: Ah, clearly someone's still steamed up about Gabys outbursts...
I bet I would agree with all of you guys too, if I had read the posts.
but they seem to have been deleted...
Probably Stefan cleaning up in order to keep the peace?
I certainly agree with you on the filesize restriction: if that is indeed all because
of Gaby's recent pic flames then: thank you Gaby for stuffing up the forum!
Are you jealous that nobody visits your own forum, that you have to come
screw up this one? (that one's @Gaby, not at you Joe. )

[Ben Waballs]

It seems others feel the same way as I do about gabys rudeness.Sorry but I dont buy a word of your gibberish bs gaby. Worse thanTseung really, and thats pretty bad.  End of story.

[chrisC]

@ Koen1:

..... Maybe we have been a bit hard on Mr. Tseung.  I do believe, like many others on here, that to have an idea is one thing.  Ideas are, or can be good.  Postulating an idea as a theory, without real experiments and controls as proof of the validity of this idea is quite another.  Lawrence has attempted a few experiments in support of his theory however I fail to see how any of those experiments prove anything.  Maybe it is just me.  I guess time will tell.

Bill

No, it's not just you Bill! When people smell baloney, they usually know what it is. Unfortunately for Mr. Tseung, his concept of 'believable' is just, that.

cheers
chrisC

[chrisC]

@ Koen1:

..... Maybe we have been a bit hard on Mr. Tseung.  I do believe, like many others on here, that to have an idea is one thing.  Ideas are, or can be good.  Postulating an idea as a theory, without real experiments and controls as proof of the validity of this idea is quite another.  Lawrence has attempted a few experiments in support of his theory however I fail to see how any of those experiments prove anything.  Maybe it is just me.  I guess time will tell.

Bill

No, it's not just you Bill! When peoplem smell baloney, they usually know what it is. Unfortunately for Mr. Tseung, his concept of 'believable' is just, that.

cheers
chrisC

[hansvonlieven]

G'day all,

Sometimes I cannot feel but sorry for Lawrence. He appears to be a really nice guy in many ways. In spite of ridicule, insults and severe criticism of his ideas he has remained cool and polite. This is very much to his credit. I would love to have a beer with him and he would be welcome in my house. He is an eccentric old man with a bee in his bonnet. But then, we all are to some extend, or we would not be hanging around in a forum such as this.

When it comes to his ideas regarding physics it becomes a different matter. The so called Lee-Tseung lead out theory is no such thing. It is at best a series of incoherent postulates that are at odds with observation. He tries to gain acceptance for his ideas and credibility by claiming credentials he simply does not have, by publishing support for his ideas using fictitious characters praising his ideas and insight and by publishing fictitious experimental data that can be proved wrong by simple experiment. That is where severe criticism is legitimate and proper.

Just my two cents worth on the subject.

Hans von Lieven