Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 54 Guests are viewing this topic.

ltseung888

What is the force and energy to pull two powerful magnets apart?

The answer is obvious to those who actually tried it.  It depends on how you do it!
1.   Try to pull it in opposite direction against the force of attraction.  This will require a large amount of force and considerable energy will be spent.
2.   Try to slide one magnet sideways first.  This will require considerable less force and consume much less energy,

Many people thought that pulling apart magnets would require X amount of energy.  Putting them back will get back at most X amount of energy.  Is that assumption correct?  Will it be possible to spend a small amount of energy x1 to pull it apart and gain back a larger amount x2 when the magnets got back together?  What would happen to the Law of Conservation of Energy in this case? 

What is the amount of energy to separate the water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen (H2O)? When people do not know any other way, they thought electrolysis was the best way.  Is that assumption correct?  Can we use a small amount of energy y1 to separate water molecules and get back a larger amount of energy y2 when we recombine them? What would happen to the Law of Conservation of Energy in this case?

This will be the Christmas puzzle for the top guns?
Compressible Fluids are Mechanical Energy Carriers. Air is not a fuel but is an energy carrier. (See reply 1097)
Gravitational or Electron Motion Energy can be Lead Out via oscillation, vibration, rotation or flux change systems.  We need to apply pulse force (Lee-Tseung Pulls) at the right time. (See reply 1106 and 2621)
1150 describes the Flying Saucer.  This will provide incredible prosperity.  Beware of the potential destructive powers.

shruggedatlas

Quote from: ltseung888 on December 22, 2009, 03:18:28 AM
What is the force and energy to pull two powerful magnets apart?

The answer is obvious to those who actually tried it.  It depends on how you do it!
1.   Try to pull it in opposite direction against the force of attraction.  This will require a large amount of force and considerable energy will be spent.
2.   Try to slide one magnet sideways first.  This will require considerable less force and consume much less energy,

This is incorrect.  How many years have gone by and you still make the same elementary physics mistakes that you did in the beginning.  I am an amateur at this, and even I can spot your errors.  You confuse force with energy, just like you did in the very beginning of this thread when you equated gravity with solar radiation.

To slide a magnet apart requires less force but the force must be applied over a longer distance.  In both cases, when accounting for friction, the work done is exactly the same, and the energy expended is identical.

You have discovered the concept behind simple machines like the lever and the double pulley system.  They are great for making the job easier when you are unable to apply a strong enough force, but they do not save any energy.

Technically, sliding the magnet apart actually requires more energy than pulling it apart, as there is more friction along the way.

broli

Quote from: shruggedatlas on December 22, 2009, 09:35:23 AM

To slide a magnet apart requires less force but the force must be applied over a longer distance.  In both cases, when accounting for friction, the work done is exactly the same, and the energy expended is identical.

Technically, sliding the magnet apart actually requires more energy than pulling it apart, as there is more friction along the way.

Please share your data, or are you just the next parrot in line that is pulling claims out of his ass???

People have performed these experiments and found potential energy differentials. If you don't agree perform your own experiments and publish the data, either that or shut the hell up and let people work in peace.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/2magpup.htm
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Kedron:Eden_Project:Permanent_Magnet_Energy_Gain


shruggedatlas

Quote from: broli on December 22, 2009, 10:58:27 AM
Please share your data, or are you just the next parrot in line that is pulling claims out of his ass???

People have performed these experiments and found potential energy differentials. If you don't agree perform your own experiments and publish the data, either that or shut the hell up and let people work in peace.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/2magpup.htm
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Kedron:Eden_Project:Permanent_Magnet_Energy_Gain

And should I perform experiments demonstrating that a square wheel does not roll as efficiently as a round one for you too?

As for the things you cite, when is JL Naudin not finding free energy?  And PESWiki, please.  Isn't that the place where Mylow was the real deal?

Basic physics says otherwise, and if you want to do your own experiments on the matter, knock yourself out.

The Observer

Say there Shrugged,

          I have made some very interesting contraptions with magnets and washers.

          If you put magnets around the outside of a large washer (4 inches),
          and take a smaller Washer (3 inches) and let it attract to the large washer...

          You can then position the smaller Washer to the very center and it will fall away.
           It is very curious and appears magic to someone accustomed to playing with magnets.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The real crux of what Mr. Tseung is saying is...

              I CAN > i can't

ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE Shrugged.

       Millions of times human kind has achieved the "impossible."

               Never has the impossible been achieved by a person who said "i can't"
               Always without exception it has be achieved by some who said "I CAN".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, Shrugged, I know you can't... Chris C certainly can't as well as a host of others here.

                                           Oh Well... thank God for the rest of us.

May the sun shine on calm waters Mr Tseung,
                                                                             The Observer