The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

How much would it cost to independently replicate that?

The present price is the 5 day training course at HK$150,000.  We do not sell the device by itself as much training and tuning is required.  One manufacturer bought a unit without the training.  It caused him and us great pains to explain the details.  His team of engineers tried to duplicate the device for weeks without success.  We had to travel to his site to sought things out.

If you wait, the price will drop as we now know how to build a DIY educational product.  We expect multiple manufacturers will license from us and build similar products.  Many engineers will be trained by us and they will provide training at a much lower price.  I expect the training course and a working eductional DIY product to be available at HK$10,000 within a year.

The price for a well-known technical laboratory to produce a professional report on such an invention in Hong Kong is HK$100,000 and up.  The price of getting a top MIT professor from USA to do an authorative report will be many time that amount.  The lawyer fee for drafting such a contract is HK$40,000 and up.

The best path for the poor Forum Members is to wait for the Presidents of the World to start the device at United Nations together and declare that the World Energy Crisis is over. 

[spoondini]

FYI for forum members, $150,000 HKD is about $20,000 USD.

Mr. Tseung,
     I would like to ask you again, is there a money back guarantee if the device is tested and inspected (before taken apart) but does not demonstrate OU as advertised (COP>2)?  A simple way to eliminate the concern of fraud would be for the money to be placed in escrow until after verification.

[ltseung888]

FYI for forum members, $150,000 HKD is about $20,000 USD.

Mr. Tseung,
     I would like to ask you again, is there a money back guarantee if the device is tested and inspected (before taken apart) but does not demonstrate OU as advertised (COP>2)?  A simple way to eliminate the concern of fraud would be for the money to be placed in escrow until after verification.

You can see the machines in the Open Shows.  You and your engineers or professors can measure the Input and Output first before you place the Order.  If there were any doubts, do not buy the Course and the prototype.  In other words, you are allowed to test and inspect the device without taking it apart FOR FREE. 

Once you pay for the Course and hence receive the device, there will be no money back.  It only takes some slight changes to shift away from the overunity Pulsing condition.  Some of the slight changes are difficult to detect.  One simple example is that not all the 16 magnets from the supplier are identical.  Interchanging their positions on the wheel shifts the overunity Pulsing Frequency. 

[spoondini]

Thank you for your response Mr. Tseung.

Unfortunately the conditions are still not eliminating concern of fraud.  At the show, the device cannot be taken apart and could contain internal/hidden power sources.  Then the money exhanges hands with no return guarantees, and the prototype machine provided does not work as advertised (even before taken apart).  I believe any astute businessman would want to ensure the prototype machine works before releasing money.  I can fully understand the concern that engineers will disassemble the machine and not be able to replicate results - and your organization does not want to take responsibility - however there still appears to be no guarantees that this is not a 'bait and switch' operation where the device at the shows is not the same as the prototype machine provided with the course, or that the prototype machine provided with the course is even guaranteed to achieve OU results before disassembled.

Can your organization eliminate any of the above concerns.

Namely that the prototype machine provided with the course is GUARANTEED to produce OU results in excess of COP=2 before disassembled (and of course no internal/hidden power sources).

[markdansie]

@Spoondini,
excellent post and you hit the nail on the head.
I witnessed one such swith the device this year overseas. The inventor had fooled prodessional engineers and investors out of many thousand dollars. Of course when my team rolled up given the investment that was being offered was in the millions, we found the hidden power sources on the prtable and not so portable devices. Without a money back guarentte that during the corse a device cannot be assembled to produce overunity lends itself to suspecting a big scam.
It is good that people can measure the device anyway they wish, and given the way it is being measured now there is no doubt that any percieved overunity is through inacurate measuring.
Well said Spoondini. If Lawernce was so confident about the overunity he would close loop the device now and offer a full refund for those doing the course, including their expenses. If that was the case I am happy to enroll my entire family including my 2 year old daughter. A fully paid hiliday for the whole family would be excellent.
However in reality, I feel good the device will available for measuring pubically, but it also has to be dismantled and independently scrutinised to remove all doubt.
Kind Regards
Mark Dansie