The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Freezer]

It's OK that timing is important, but "resonance" is not a time.  At what time can a pulse be applied to a pendulum so that you get more energy out than you put in?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r003GmW4ZrM

Dear Freezer,

I love your video.  If possible, can you produce one with a punch bag and show:

(1) A little boy punching it.  It hardly moved.
(2) The same little boy pushing it like a swing.  The multiple pushes will increase the amplitude of the swing.
(3) Let the swinging punch bag hit a dummy (use a dummy to avoid hurting the little boy.  Or you may find a special actor).

Thank you.

Lawrence Tseung
The experiment done by the naugthy Tseung 50 years ago Leads Out the use of infinite gravitational energy for Mankind.

Closest I could find 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uY77ffkgo4&mode=related&search=

This guy seems to think he can get more out than in from this pendulum motion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_XVuMdSro4&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgnxMqVAFKM

[shruggedatlas]

It's OK that timing is important, but "resonance" is not a time.  At what time can a pulse be applied to a pendulum so that you get more energy out than you put in?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r003GmW4ZrM

Dear Freezer,

I love your video.  If possible, can you produce one with a punch bag and show:

(1) A little boy punching it.  It hardly moved.
(2) The same little boy pushing it like a swing.  The multiple pushes will increase the amplitude of the swing.
(3) Let the swinging punch bag hit a dummy (use a dummy to avoid hurting the little boy.  Or you may find a special actor).

Thank you.

Lawrence Tseung
The experiment done by the naugthy Tseung 50 years ago Leads Out the use of infinite gravitational energy for Mankind.

Closest I could find 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uY77ffkgo4&mode=related&search=

Now I understand.  It is Lead Out energy that make Kung Fu strong.

In all seriousness, the proposed test is ridiculous.  Of course the bag will knock the little boy or stand-in dummy back.  Unfortunately it will tell us nothing about whether any energy was lead out, or whether the knock-back is merely the result of the many pushes.

[ltseung888]

If I am not mistaken, you have concluded that the first pulse does not add more energy that you put in.

No, that's what you said.  I said "why not a punch", and you said "periodically repeated", implying that one punch won't do.  If one pulse will do, then, again, what is it about a punch that doesn't qualify as a "pulse" that leads out gravitational energy?

Thank you, Mr. Entropy.  Now we focus on the question whether a punch qualifies as a pulse in the Lee-Tseung theory.

My simple answer is NO.  NO. NO, NO and NO.

The reasons are:
(1)   To Impart energy to a swing and to Lead Out gravitational energy, we must allow the String of the Pendulum to move/swing and gradually increase its tension.  During this gradual increase, the Law of Parallelogram of Forces can be applied.  It is the application of this Law that Leads Out gravitational energy.  No energy should be wasted on collision sound or deformation of the sand or similar material inside the punch bag.

(2)   In punching the punch bag, the force is applied quickly.  The rate of change of momentum is intended to be as fast as possible.  (In Physics terminology: Force is the rate of change of Momentum.)  We want the punch to exert the maximum force on the opponent! The sand or similar material in the bunch bag will deform to absorb the energy.  The best punch is that the String barely moved.

(3)   If the punch is very slow - to become a push, the String of the Punch bag will move.  The Punch bag system then simulates a Pendulum.  (Pushing a person is very different from punching a person.)

Hope the reasons are clear.

@Freezer,

In Kung Fu, we want the opponent's organs to deform to "absorb our energy".  The evil intention is to destroy his muscles and/or organs and not to push him away.

[Freezer]

Does it relate to tossing a bowling ball?  Surely most of us couldn't  throw a bowling ball that far, but if we slowly build up momentum we can launch it fairly fast.  Its hard to think of something similar that relates to daily life.

I think whats happening in the kung fu video is similar.  The guy can't immediately force the weight to move, he has to build up the momentum in order to move the weight at the end.  I wasn't concentrating on the impacting of the bell.

For the OU believers, Newton said, if nothing else, for every action there is a reaction.  We work from there.

Watch at 7:40.  Exception to the rule?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZMzHTERr-E&mode=related&search=

[ecc]

Bruce DePalma et al discovered  in 1974 that a spinning steel ball would show different rates of rising and falling  when accellerated upwards or falling downwards compared to a non spinnig ball.   

In 1977 he wrote a paper: "Understandig the Dropping of the Spinning Ball Experiment"  which says in conclusion:

>The availability of free energy from as simple an experiment as colliding a rotating object with a non-rotating one opens up the development of other machines for energy extraction and propulsion which may be more convenient to handle than the extraction of energy from the collision of a rotating object with a non-rotating one. <

link: http://depalma.pair.com/SpinningBall(Understanding).html

Lawrence, do you think this matches with your theory?

Cheers

ecc