The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Evil Roy Slade]

Tseung: ?The square wheel by itself without any attachment could rotate up to 16 minutes.  When we attached the two cylinders of 80% sand, we could get a rotational time of 30 minutes.  The sand moved inside the tube, providing the pulse.?

What do you guys think?

My considered judgement of this theory is that it's quite similar to the rear emanations of a male bovine.

ERS

[chrisC]

Tseung: ?The square wheel by itself without any attachment could rotate up to 16 minutes.  When we attached the two cylinders of 80% sand, we could get a rotational time of 30 minutes.  The sand moved inside the tube, providing the pulse.?

What do you guys think?

My considered judgement of this theory is that it's quite similar to the rear emanations of a male bovine.

ERS

Oh be nice Roy!  Perhaps a female bovine would be a tad nicer? Ceratinly softer, don't you think so?

cheers
chrisC

[Evil Roy Slade]

I know it was a tad harsh, but they don't call me Evil for nuffin!

I sincerely hope nobody gets taken in by this Mr Tseung and send him money.

ERS

[usama salah]

hi ,Lawrence
thank you for answers ,it is very clear .and very important works.
i hope a quick  success for all of you

best regards for all

[hansvonlieven]

Tseung: ?The square wheel by itself without any attachment could rotate up to 16 minutes.  When we attached the two cylinders of 80% sand, we could get a rotational time of 30 minutes.  The sand moved inside the tube, providing the pulse.?

I did find one testable claim in all of what Tseung wrote.  See above quote.  I do not actually believe that this can happen, so if it does, that would be pretty amazing to me.  My prediction is that the moving sand will only hinder the wheel's rotation. 

The only thing that maybe was missed is that to have a proper test, there should be we exact same weights attached in the control experiment, but not containing sand.  Or perhaps for simplicity and to assure equal weight, fill empty space with cotton to prevent sand from moving.

What do you guys think?

The square "wheel" in question is  2' 6" X 2' 6" or thereabouts. It is made of !/4 inch plexiglass or some other acrylic sheeting, in other words it is light. It is also full of holes.

Now if someone were to design a rotating body aerodynamically worse than this one it would require a lot of inspired thinking.

The square edges cut into the air like a blunt knife, the holes create turbulence across the entire surface, the square shape creates an imbalance, all factors that waste a lot of energy. On top of that the wheel has little mass to store energy.

Such a wheel will NOT rotate on a shaft for 16 minutes, even with frictionless bearings, no matter how hard the push. He will be lucky to get 16 rotations, more likely around five. As to the addition of equally aerodynamically idiotic sand cylinders virtually doubling the run time this is just laughable and not worthy of serious comment

These data are plainly fictitious, which is about the worst thing anyone can do in science and our Mr. Tseung is guilty of it!

The data on the air pump are equally made up. I don't have enough time right now but I will furnish proof in a further post.

Hans von Lieven