The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Pirate88179]

@ Lawrence:

With all due respect, in your example as pictured, the centripetal forces of the rotation would render those balls immobile and therefore stop any rotation that may or may not occur from the action of the bounce effect from the two dissimilar surfaces. If in fact it rotated at all, I envision this stopping almost immediately. Interesting idea though.  Have you considered this?

Bill

[Whoflungdung]

Like this?

[Koen1]

The continued experiments include: 
(1) different padding
(2) different falling height
(3) different diameter of wheel
(4) different weight of wheel or attaching different weights to rim
(5) different speed of rotation
(6) addition of different load to change friction
(7) different size balls
( different number of tubes
(9) different angle of the tubes

Such comprehensive experiments will take time.  Hopefully, the balls will not jump out.

Ah yes, obviously Tseungian science eh? "Hopefully", right after you have
told Shruggedatlas off on why it will definately work. Hilarious.

Besides you forgot the most important step in the experimentation:
Step (0): find an alternate reality where Tseungs fantasies do work, in
contrast to the current reality.

[SeanTheLight]

Instead of bashing someones idea without testing, I went to working model and simulated the design Dr. tseung suggested.

the result?

http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s152/murdock2id/workingmodelunhappy2.jpg

Dr tseung may not be american, but his theories and thought exercises have been helpful for me. I am saddened when i see open hostility towards people on this forum, especially when that behavior seems to be coming from established people on the forum. What harm does Dr tseung do by saying what he does? Whose interests are threatened? If his ideas are wrong, others will catch on to that, and he will be marginalized. If he is correct, than his theory is only a very small step towards better understanding force effects.

Either way, why does it merit hostility?

Dr Tseung, your design is interesting. I will possibly add it to my list of "simple designs I must re-create", especially since it will not simulate properly in working model 2D.

[Koen1]

Well Sean, the thing is that Tseung has been shouting
"I have the solution to Free Energy!
I have a theory that explains it all!
I can tell you exactly how to build a machine what makes Free Energy!"
but then when push comes to shove and we ask him to show us
something tangiable, he can never do so, or he refuses to do so,
for invalid reasons.
He shouts a lot but never comes up with any empirical proof.
He recycles other peoples "over unity" ideas, then makes his
own drawing of that idea, and then starts shouting that this is now
his idea because his theory explains it all, even though he can or
will never show proof of that.
That's Tseungs method of "research": taking other peoples ideas,
making a drawing based mostly on what he hopes may happen instead
of actually properly calculating it and instead of building a test model,
and then starts claiming his "theory" explains it all.
Well, it just doesn't.

And if that were where his charade ended, it would still be ok-ish I guess.

But then Tseung flings all ties to reality out the window and starts
proclaiming himself as the great visionary who will bring eternal
peace and prosperity to the world, starting of course in China,
and starts posting hypothetical developments that might happen if
there were FE/OU devices available and if humanity would unite
and set itself a goal to make a better world based on logic and
FE technology.
Well of course it's nice to dream of a perfect world,
but it is seriously unrealistic to talk about it as if you are the one who is
going to make it all happen, if you cannot even show fellow
FE/OU enthousiasts any working version of a FE device of which
you have been shouting you know and can fully explain the function
and process.
That is very much like shouting "I have the solution to the fuel crisis!"
or "I have the solution to world hunger!" and claiming you can explain
to people exactly how such a solution works,
but unfortunately you don't have any practical applications, examples,
or working prototypes, experimental reactors, nothing of the sort,
and you can't really build one either.
But you do have the solution, oh yes!

You must see that is just producing a lot of hot air...?

As for that example you posted, it doesn't really prove anything yet, does it?
It just proves that the software you used to simulate the setup cannot handle
such a setup.
Doesn't mean that is does work.

So as I see it, our "problem" with Tseung is not that he is not an American,
as many people here are not Americans and in fact I think the nationality card
is one of the most stupid reasons to dismiss someones ideas.
Our "problem" with Tseung is that he keeps blowing his own horn while
never actually coming up with any proof of anything, and at the same
time sliding downhill at increasing speed with all of the fake personas he uses
to post fake discussions about himself in this same thread.

Take that ball and padding example. Making a drawing is one thing, even
small children can and do do it. But if you post a claim "this is a OU device and works"
then the least you can do is build a version yourself and post pics and preferably
videos on it.
I want to bet Tseung has never built a version and never will build a version.
Yet he will continue to claim it is an OU device, and will probably find a way
to fantasize it into a flying saucer again.
And he will reward himself again, and proclaim himself the great hero
for "inventing" this fantastic FE device, and go on fantasizing about
international energy conferences where he is celebrated as a hero,
and about the UN implementing his devices, and so on and so on...
...
... but meanwhile all he has been able to produce is a huge amount of
text, a few simple drawings, and variations of other peoples ideas.
Zero proof. Not one working device. Not one valid experiment.
Nothing.

I hope that helps you to understand the main "problem" with Tseung.

If he would just reschedule the time he spends from 100% talk and 0% documented
experiment to 10% talk and 90% documented experiment, I bet he would
all of a sudden post a lot less because he would discover most of his ideas
(or actually other peoples ideas which he has redrawn) do not work in practise.
But since he never tries any real proper experiments, he never disproves his
assumptions, and carefully avoids having to do any experimentation.