The truth about "overunity".

[Navi-gator]

If you read the report, he states it requires 7450 Watts to power the 5000 Watt generator, so there is your efficiency right there.

I think you should reread the report, Ted Carnes 1/2/05, due to the fact you have completely and utterly failed to comprehend what was being explained. It has made me seriously question the statement you made about "tutoring people who put there feet in their mouth", based on your last statement you could use some of that tutoring.

[armagdn03]

Just for giggles, (and im sure im wrong as you will all prove) I googled Dr. Richard Olenick and only found references to one gift 4 power.

Um, well....uh....I dont think this bodes to well for mr. Dante.

Also, how come so many people are comming out of the wood work to "credit" mr dantes work that have never posted before.....

Seriously, if you really have the science part done, you are protected by copywrite law. SO WHERE IS THE PROOOOOOOF!

PUT UP, OR SHUT UP!!!

Lets stop all this nonesense!

If you have the awnser, I suspect a pattent # exists.
Under law, you are already protected by copywrite.
So......Unless you have proof of concept, documentation, video, analysis, etc.... DONT POST ANYMORE.

You are wasting our time and energy.

AND, even if you have the awnser and you are looking to make a huge profit, im sure well see it on the market place soon, so no need to post in these forums anymore unless you have something to share.

Less blah blah blah
more cold hard numbers (and concepts, and science)

This is not a literature contest

[FreeEnergy]

I have been reading from the sidelines - And will not participate in the back-and-forth. However, I have one main question for all of you who have "Skirted" the following question repeatedly:

No one seems to comment on the 2 gentlemen that have written reports regarding Dante?s work - Specifically Dr. Richard Olenick and Ted Carnes.

There seems to be a lot of rock-throwing at the man Dante. However, when the mentions of the preceding reputable persons are brought up - No one seems to comment.

I guess what you all are saying is that since you call Dante?s work a scam (with no proof I might ad, just off definitions you think can never be wrong or modified with new findings overlooked by previous "Experts") - Are you calling to 2 above gentlemen incorrect in their reports?

I would like to hear what all of you "Very Busy" people have to say about ALL of the reports written on Dante?s behalf - especially the bio that states that Mr. Carnes was originally interested in Dante?s work to DISPROOVE it - And, instead, validated it.......

Seems to me that Dante has more on his side than you guys have to throw at him. You have definitions of this and that - He has real experts who have tried to Disprove him - And, wrote reports to the contrary.

Just curious.

thanks for the info.

edit - just found this: http://www.onegift4power.org/TheGift.html

is it open source technology?

[Navi-gator]

Just for giggles, (and im sure im wrong as you will all prove) I googled Dr. Richard Olenick and only found references to one gift 4 power.

Um, well....uh....I dont think this bodes to well for mr. Dante.

Also, how come so many people are comming out of the wood work to "credit" mr dantes work that have never posted before.....

Seriously, if you really have the science part done, you are protected by copywrite law. SO WHERE IS THE PROOOOOOOF!

PUT UP, OR SHUT UP!!!

Lets stop all this nonesense!

If you have the awnser, I suspect a pattent # exists.
Under law, you are already protected by copywrite.
So......Unless you have proof of concept, documentation, video, analysis, etc.... DONT POST ANYMORE.

You are wasting our time and energy.

AND, even if you have the awnser and you are looking to make a huge profit, im sure well see it on the market place soon, so no need to post in these forums anymore unless you have something to share.

Less blah blah blah
more cold hard numbers (and concepts, and science)

This is not a literature contest

Try  "Richard P. Olenick" and the search results will be much different. I will make it easy, the first five results...

http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&search-type=ss&index=books&field-author=Richard%20P.%20Olenick&page=1

http://www.bookfinder.com/author/richard-p-olenick/

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988PEPI...50..203C

http://www.bestwebbuys.com/Beyond_the_Mechanical_Universe-ISBN_9780521304306.html?isrc=b-search

http://phys.udallas.edu/

If you feel this is a waste of your time then why are participating in the discussion?

Is there a more suitable place to share information on something like this?

[FreeEnergy]

does not seem to be open source