Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



flux laminator

Started by gaby de wilde, September 14, 2007, 11:08:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

gaby de wilde

Quote3 POINT INTERACTION
ABSTRACT
Unleash complimentary reactions utilizing the subtraction of contradicting actions.
http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/text/3-point-interaction/

Attached image:
the top magnet inducts a field into the strips of steel, those are pushed and pulled as a result thereof (see paper). ;)
blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

ken_nyus

Gaby,

On your page with the explanation, at first you are talking about "body1", "body 2", "body 3". but then you switch to this language...

"...On the side of our to be secondary magnet ..."

You lose me there when you start using the words "secondary magnet", "primary magnet".

Can you relate this back to "body 1" etc.?

gaby de wilde

Quote from: ken_nyus on September 14, 2007, 02:48:20 PM
On your page with the explanation, at first you are talking about "body1", "body 2", "body 3". but then you switch to this language...

"...On the side of our to be secondary magnet ..."

You lose me there when you start using the words "secondary magnet", "primary magnet".

Can you relate this back to "body 1" etc.?

It says "On the side of our to be secondary magnet one already finds 2 poles." meaning the secondary magnet is playing a double role as body 2 and 3. I didn't know which way would be better to explain, ended up using both not explaining it at all. haha

In the drawing above a field is inducted into the steel stator strips by the rotor magnet at the top. The rotor magnet in the center then pulls and pushes against the magnetised strip.

From what I tested so far the center magnet's push and pull combined express more force onto the rotor as the top magnet needs to move over the next strip.

It's a magnetic communicator!

:-)
blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

gaby de wilde

common kids? I figure there are only 2 things going on (for anyone to debunk.)

1) the rotating communicator magnet is suffering incredible eddy drag from moving from one strip to the next strip.

2) the magnetised stator strip is not push/pulling the core rotor magnet.

Which one will it be?

What I think happens:

The strip on the domain-wall of the core magnet is not subjected to either pole. But the 3rd pole (at the top) is inducting it's field in it. This field accelerates the strip away from the domain wall with more force as the rotating stator magnet expresses onto it, the stator doesn't care and just inducts it's field in the very next strip etc. :D

I still have not decently tested my hypothesis but it seems to work.

Where is the flaw?
blog  | papers | tech | inventors  | video

brnbrade

Hi gaby

Which software you used to draw?

tks