Giantkiller moves forward into Full Heterodyning.

[sparks]

       The Earth the big electron.  The mass spinning at the poles is way less then the mass spinning at the Equator. Two cyclones back to back.  With the mass low pressure area's at the poles.  But as pointed out the electron's potential energy field is pulsating and spinning. So most likely is the Earth's.  The Earth's electrons have angular momentum hence the magnetic dipole but the massless potential energy held in resonant frequencies could be a whole nother scene.  There could well be a highfrequency voltage field pulsating and spinning which is why the Earth spins to begin with. Betya the wavelength has something in common  with the spherical diameter of the Earth and or it's shock front the magnetosphere.

[aleks]

particles are standing waves... where are you going with that? how can a standing wave move? for it to move, the physical entity that carries constraints causing the standing wave should move instead. but what is that physical entity that moves and is able to sustain standing wave? this isn't going anywhere: you should not talk about standing waves without giving a clue of why it is standing, what supports its state of standing. not to mention that there are no self-sustaining standing waves in mechanics: you may of course pretend an infinitely massive surrounding that causes wave to bounce inside it without energy losses. but then again, if standing wave is surrounded by something, isn't it easier to deal with its surrounding directly?

probably calling it a perturbation within a state-space scalar field could be more correct.

[Feynman]

Standing waves are just scalar waves, right?   These do exist.   That part does not bother me in this theory so much as the finite amplitude of the Wolf's electron scalar wave. 

Aleks I agree with you. Wolf is more accurately describing a perturbation theory in state space. I mean, technically, regular QED is a perturbation theory of the electromagnetic quantum vacuum. I think Wolf theory has problems.  I also have alot of questions.  But perhaps this is a new way to think of building quantum theory using only waves.   Dirac, Einstein, and Schroedinger all did not believe QED results were particles. 

Anyway, what I found  really interesting was this (Doppler shift of the IN/OUT scalar waves):

A.  Properties of a Moving Space Resonance.
Quantum mechanics and special relativity seem unrelated, but they have one feature in common:  Both laws depend on the relative velocity between two particles.  Therefore, we should investigate the interaction of two space resonances in relative motion.  One SR may be thought of as a source interacting with the other SR, as an absorber or observer.

Consider two SRs moving with relative velocity b = v/c.  Each receives the same Doppler shifted waves from the other.  They are symmetrical.  Their IN waves are red-shifted and their OUT waves are blue-shifted according to the  usual Doppler factors, g(1+b) and g(1-b) which shift frequency and wavelength.
The received amplitude of each SR is the sum of Doppler-shifted IN and OUT waves  which reduces to,   AMP = shifted {AMPIN + AMPOUT } =  (2/r) eikg(ct + br)   sin[kg(bct + r)]                       (

Equation ( is composed of an exponential carrier wave modulated by a sine function.   The  relativistic term, g = [1- (v/c)2]-1/2 , occurs properly  to match experimental observation. It is a result of the  Doppler effect on the combined IN and OUT waves. These matching results are:

The parameters of the exponential oscillator are:
wavelength = h/gmv = deBroglie wavelength, L.
frequency  = kgc/(2 pi) = gmc2/h = mass-energy  frequency.
velocity    =  c/b  = phase velocity.

The  parameters of the sine function are:
wavelength  = h/gmc  =  Compton wavelength.
frequency  =  gmc2 b/h  =  b x (mass frequency) =  "momentum  frequency".
velocity = bc = v = relative velocity of the  two resonances.

The above matching results are remarkable!   They clearly show the origin of mass increase and quantum mechanics in the wave structure of matter. It is instructive to compare Equation ( for moving electrons with Equation (2) for a stationary electron.  They are of the same form but ( contains the velocity b = v/c and the related quantum and relativistic properties  for moving particles.

http://quantummatter.com/articles_html/body_point.html

So I agree this is not a final theory or anything, but perhaps it is a way forward out of the particle swamp.

[aleks]

Standing waves are just scalar waves, right?   These do exist.

Standing wave is not a scalar wave. Standing wave is caused by reflections and by interference of propagating waves. For standing wave to exist, energy should be emitted continously or existing energy should be bounced around without much energy losses (this is how IBM slows down the light). Beside that scalar wave is a purely hypothetical wave from what I've read. Well, in my own hypothesis of 'DC acoustic waves' the DC acoustic wave I also call 'wave', but in practice it is more of a force formation best expressed as a 'bump' in scalar field of global gravity force. It is in no way a standing wave, because it is not a wave - it does not oscillate when in penetrates the space: only its intensity (and thus reach) can oscillate. So, it is another type of wave that cannot be called longitudinal nor transversal. Probably it could be said that DC waves penetrate space whereas longitudinal and transversal waves propagate through space.

I'm myself very wary of wave functions that oscillate from positive to negative. Nature likes -6dB/oct energy roll-off toward higher frequencies. What I usually see in wave functions is a band-limited sinc function whose roll-off is infinite after the cutoff point. This is surreal. If math guys used a -6dB/oct after the cutoff point, the wave function would never change its sign and could look more like a gaussian curve for any particle.

[giantkiller]

In heterodyning there are waves constantly moving outward. but at certain distances there are increases in power due to harmonics matching up. These increases 'stand still' just like atomic shells. By tuning the associated freqs one can move the shell or make it stronger. More electrons?
It looks like in this shell there is maximum amout of energy just like when electrons jump to the next permissble shell from a resident shell. I didn't measure the distances in my tests but at ratio wise there should be some correlation.

Vortexes also show up when an object moves through a viscous material. Some of the material is dragged along with the moving object. We all know this. So why when the medium or labels changes should the rules change?

In the sm17, the two rings are fired in opposite directions to cause the surrounding magnetic fields to either exit or enter perpendicular at the sides of the device. With the right frequencies the heterodyned results can rotate in either direction to cause a vortex thereby pulling electrons in. Then the TPU looks like virtual hydrogen atom using magnetic fields. The closer the device looks like a galactic, solar or planetary expression the closer the ease of operation becomes. This is the only place I won't buck the norm. The Aurora Borealis is a resultant expectancy of the energy entering the poles.
When the rings are fired in the same direction there is an opposing clash of fields between the rings. High energy ejects perendicularly.

--giantkiller. Same rules, different place.