TPU - General Discussion

[z_p_e]

Gravity may (and I stress may) indeed play a role in determining the direction or polarization of energy utilized by the TPU in operation, but the energy being extracted, converted,  or generated by the TPU is not coming from gravity itself.

Tesla in his experiments with RE knew this energy was directional and flowed from space towards earth, but even he apparently did not speculate as to what caused the flow in this direction.

"Antigrav" effects, if apparent in TPU operation need not be a result of manipulating gravity itself, but could in reality be the result of magnetic vortex/TPU attraction, just as two opposite mag fields attract. At the power levels being generated by the TPU's, it is quite conceivable that the devices could lose weight during operation.

Sweet's VTA exhibited "antigravity" effects as well when operated at high output, but the device itself does not tap gravity as its source. IMHO, the VTA and TPU operate on very similar principles.

[Earl]

Think of planet Earth as a spherical bathtub, filled with aether "water" extending infinitely in all directions.

A spinning magnetic and/or electric field opens up a drain plug right through the center of the toroid.

Then the aether vortex goes pouring through, down the drain.

A TPU is a bathtub with electrically-operated drain plug.

Earl

[Earl]

The bottom of the bathtub is the surface of Earth.

[z_p_e]

Water vortexes form because gravity has an effect on water.

Since gravity does not affect a magnetic field, how can gravity come into play in an electromagnetic device?

[BEP]

Another thought to share - maybe it is useful here:

I feel very strongly were are indeed dealing with three frequencies here - I should say pulse rate frequencies, sine, if you wish. Either way the result will be sine.
But not in the way I have seen discussed here (no I haven't read EVERY post so forgive me if I re-hash something).

My previous toys only required one base frequency. The 'Third' is the component of the base frequencies of the two separate coils (oddly enough after joining this forum I decided to fire-up in a low level mode and check.) Mine was not meant to be stable so the component varies wildly but centers in the Schumann range. The component is what did the dirty work but only lasted a few cycles before the caps were done.

Also the two bases were identical. One in the top coil and an opposite rotation but same frequency in the bottom coil (Phase and rotation difference only). The component was created by the two. All three wind up appearing in both coils. The two separate oscillators are connected in a multi-vibrator fashion.  So the two IGBT's never fire at exactly the same time. And yes, I use magnetostriction as the first step.

The object was to make separate sourced waves and any harmonics meet in a way to multiply the area of the resultant wave. Separate waves of the same source generally cancel. This was with the belief that a wave's energy is the square of its area. When such waves meet in this way you start squaring upon squaring and wind up with astronomical numbers. I have not tried this with transverse waves.

If nothing else this is a great way to explode caps and cause radios to quit  

I didn't engineer in a means to automatically hold it back or follow the mechanical/resonance changes. The most I wanted was about three giant pulses.

The big difference I'm only now seeing - I have no means of collecting the organized (particles?) and keeping it just off-center for a continuous run.

I'm working on a solution for both......