Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?

[RadiantEnRg]

LOL, I am not emotional at all!
And I never called you a hoe...I suspect you to be a Pro
As for the 200v cap's negative terminal, it is commonly grounded to the 1st circuit.... Like i said I am not hip to your lingo!!.....What I meant by PLL is that the sensing loop on the xformer is triggering the 1st circuits discharge via mosfet...hence phase locking loop
Also...YOU ARE COMPLETELY WRONG!!!....the Fet is triggered DIRECTLY BY RESISTIVE DIVIDER!!....gate is controlled by the sensing loop....and PWM drives OPTO!!!!! which pulses output circuit!!!!
You are not an authority...Nor have you seen this circuit...so ya...nice try...Maybe you're a Pro-Hoe???

Ohh and the Tesla remark pertains to disruptive discharging of capacitors!! So please....stoo foo....LOL....as I said b4 you give yourself way!!!! too much credit
You are not psychic..and i doubt you know this circuit...or any other Delta ADP circuits....Delta is an internationally renowned power supply company.

[linda933]

Lots of incorrect assertions there; still no science.  I know the circuit quite well and I am not wrong.  But it is clear you would rather argue foolishly and name-call than do a simple test which would prove that the theory of power supply disruption is not at play.  Sorry you feel that way.  It's dissapointing but not surprising.  Carry on, then, and good luck to you.

Linda

[RadiantEnRg]

Ok...here's the cold hard truth Linda
I am so adamant about my power supply not doing that...because i have scoped it...and metered it with a H2Earth colleagues meter.
The fact of the matter is.....I don't like being called names.....It upsets me
Like I have said maybe.....I don't know...5 times now...I kept experimenting with power supply and eventually destroyed it..along with 4 other similar ones...NOT DOING THE MOTOR OR COIL TEST!!...doing a separate experiment....where I tapped into the 1st circuit...."bad idea".....anyway Linda......I will show you as soon as I get another....However!!!....you are taking petty pot shots at my intelligence, when in fact I gave 100% disclosure...Get the power supply yourself...then you can offer your opinion...because right now...you THINK you know what exactly is in this circuit...and you THINK it's giving higher voltage.....I KNOW it's not...according to a multimeter.

So in conclusion...My frustration comes out of the fact that you make statements as if you are here with me, actually looking at the circuit I have IN MY HANDS!!!

[linda933]

Did it ever occur to you that I might have one of those very same power supplies, too?  Or a full schematic?  Or that nearly all small switching supplies use very common basic app-note circuits?  Well...you should check it out...the topologies in small wall-wart switchmode power supplies have a lot more in common than they have differences.

I apologize if you feel like I am attacking you.  I don't recall ever calling you any names.  I said your understanding of how your power supply works is naive.  I still believe that...more every time you post.  All the talk of PLLs, switch-mode MOSFETs being directly driven by resistive voltage feedback dividers, etc etc etc...it's just not even on the page!

I am not the only person who has repeatedly asked you to show the voltage with a meter and/or a scope or to use a battery instead of your switching supply.  Could you please explain why you have not done that?  I am beginning to think that you have privately done it and that it (the motor speeding up) didn't work anymore using a battery or that you found the supply voltage did rise.  I can't think of any other reason you would spend so much time writing words ridiculing the idea of RF interference messing with the power supply when it would be so simple to disprove! 

Can you answer the straightforward question as to why you so vehemently refuse to check and resolve this simple matter in the way that Stefan Hartmann, myself and several others have repeatedly suggested and requested?  It's becoming quite puzzling...

Please?

Linda

[RadiantEnRg]

OK LINDA....So now for the 6th time.....I fried the power supply!!!....I will gladly do it again when I pick a new one up.
I told you I HAVE done it privately.....Answer me this Linda.....Do all small power supplies give out a perfect sawtooth wave???...and do they have all the negative capacitor terminals go to an insulated plate???

Your rationalizations do not impress me...they may dissuade people....But good for them, means I will be the only one doing it

And one more fact....You pride yourself on being an Imperialistic Scientist...yet you and others are BLIND....You cannot make inferences on things you cannot see.

Point in case......The Bead does not make the motor go faster in either case(the large 12v motor, or the small hobby motor)...what it does...is allow instantaneous RESONANCE!!!!!
If you go back and watch my 1st videos...you will see I must "coax" the effect(w/o bead it's faster once in resonance then with bead)....however, with the bead...all I have to do is flip a switch and it automatically hits it's NEW resonance with it's spherical spark gap/waveguide

You keep pounding this dead horse into the ground...However, I have told you HOW MANY TIMES NOW? I blew up the power supply....I would love to smear your face in the fact that doesn't go to a higher V....Sadly i must wait to "stick the sock in your mouth"


OHHHHH....here's one more thing for ya Linda....Armagagn03 has used KVs to try and replicate....surely your not saying the lil power supply passes that??....ONE MORE TIME.....IT"S RESONANCE PEOPLE....in conjunction with BEMF!!!