F.B.D.I.S.S.M - Flux.Boosted.Dual.Induction.Split.Spiral.Motor.

[FatChance!!!]

Sorry but your full of crap, Bolt.

If it was as easy as your claims (by imagined theories) then OU would be reality by now.
Of course there is no way getting OU by lowering the losses of a device.
When all losses are down to zero, all you have is a 100% efficient device, not overunity.

Making a self looped system would require at least COP 2 before it could work.

And what do I read
Do you actually believe that Magnacoaster have made anything but lies, talk and promises.
He's got nothing going. It's all a scam from a very lousy guy only being able to fool the ignorants.

When you actually bring up such theories and use MagnaCrook as example, then I actually believe
your the perfect example of an extreme free energy fanatic or just a simple hillbilly ignorant.

[bolt]

"If it was as easy as your claims (by imagined theories) then OU would be reality by now."

Of course its a reality has been for 100 years only greed and corruption prevent an open public solution.  Its starts with energy savings you cant loop something thats waste 50% of the energy put into it. As COP > 2 i agree but it also means high efficiency device only requires a few watts to make up the systems losses. See water pump man he had to "tweak" the generator to make it very efficient by cleaning bearings of thick grease so it free wheels and tune to resonance using run caps so that it will run with enough OU to run a 60 watt lamp.

The HHO generator looped required tuning and matching of the generator load using a variac as tuning inductor into resonance allows excess of HHO enough to run the genset. Together with timing tweaks its enough to loop with excess power to run a flood lamp.

RV looped 5HP motors yield about 100 watt OU this has been done several times in fact to my personal knowledge and I am sure a lot more in private. Its only in the last few years people have started approaching resonance seriously as a means to looping and OU stuff. Prior to that still looking for swamp gas and "ether" charge as bedinni style BS to make something simple sound amazing and out of reach of the masses unless you were a member of the magic circle.

Magnacoaster principal works although stability still a problem. His is now a serious political problem as he ventures into commercial world he can not sell ANYTHING without FCC approvals and a ton of other red tape permits. The day he sells anything is the day he will be shut down by a SWAT team they are on standby. This is the price you pay for seeing $$$$$'s and the patent route instead of open source.

[wattsup]

@bolt

I agree with your position but the main point here is how to help @honk with some more constructive ideas instead of just leaning back on a comfy sofa saying "it can't be done". There are always other angles to consider.

My attempt to explain the importance of leverage in these types of builds is only to show that there is another step that can be tried with what is already in hand. Trying to join constructive help with what is already practical and in hand.

Going off on this OU is this and that bit is simply just repeating what we already know. @honk already knows the cards are already stacked against him like we all already know this 1 million times over in whatever we do. So what is the point in rubbing his face into it is my question.

I think @honks build has the perfect size and weights that can enjoy some advantage with leverage, momentum, inertia, etc. He has one hell of a toy in his hands and the ways to play with it are many. And, the more you play, the more you learn. It's all part of the process.

What would happen if you had a three foot wheel that turns from the outer edge forces and you have a 4" center shaft that extends from each side outwards 10 feet. On that shaft you put magnets and around that shaft you put pick up coils. The rpm at the shaft will be lower because of the lower speed per degree of spin but if those coils are put into series then in parallel it should produce some interesting output while the big wheel provides tremendous leverage to counter any drag. @honks build should be able to take advantage of this with very minor changes.

wattsup

[hartiberlin]

Hi Honk,
well done and many thanks, that you published also the first non working prototype,
so we all can learn from it.

Maybe you can just modify the electromagnets now and try
toroidal electromagnets like in an ORBO device ?

This will have NO induction from the
rotor magnets if you put 2 toroids in series out of phase but will
do the trick to bring the rotor magnets over their sticky spot.

Would really love to see this implemented at this diameter size.
Good luck !

Regards, Stefan.

[Ted Ewert]

Beautiful build, those magnets alone must have cost a small fortune.
Nevertheless, one look at those coils told me all I needed to know about your low COP. Winding coils with a very small number of turns and relatively large wire guage, guaranteed a low efficiency. It's not a large B field you need.
Using much smaller wire and a hundred times more turns you could have used 1/10th the power and generated a large H field instead. Even driving the coils with 200 watts you could recapture most of it back with the right kind of recovery circuit.
All you did was spend a lot of time and money to prove the coils you designed didn't work efficiently. Why stop there? Why not try a pair of high H field coils. Use a much smaller diameter core with a large steel cap on the end facing the rotor. Then pack the space the coil fits in with as many turns as you can. Use 26 or 28 awg, and wire the two coils in series. Start with a high voltage pulse, around 200 VDC, and work up from there. Your COP should improve dramatically.
But then again, maybe you really didn't want it to work in the first place...

Ted