Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[DrStiffler]

Here are more photos of my hack.

I am using the "standard" core of about 710uH in secondary while primary has 8 turns of 22 AWG making it 4uH or so, can't exactly say. I have replaced the original transistor with BD243 (plain one, though I have a C version here I did not want to risk burning those yet ). I have a diode going from the ground rail via a 180pF cap to the base. I did this remembering that Bedini used a diode across the ground to the base to protect the transistor from BEMF, but maybe this is just redundant in this case, not sure. Or maybe nobody in their right mind would connect a diode and a cap in series but me.
A 350K 1/4w resistor from power rail to the base; emitter on the ground and one end of the primary to the collector. The other end of the collector is on the power rail. Also, there's a 1.1uH generic choke feeding the secondary, which ends are in this case reversed (as seen in the photo).
Each side has 50x 5mm 55,000mcd LEDs in series connected via diodes to the common feed rail on either ends of the LEDs.

The small board has 14x 10mm 130,000mcd LEDs in series and diodes on both ends connected to the common feed rail. These small boards are connected in series so that one input goes on one side and output of the other side of the common rail, even though I am not sure if that is crucial, you could simply daisy chain from the same spot.

Lastly, the scope shot of the circuit running with only 100 LEDs connected. For some reason the values are different than last night, HV output is lower for that matter, possibly because I did not connect the other 42 large LEDs in, or for some other (unknown to me) reason. My scope's probe is x100, since I do not fancy some HV killing my (recently acquired) THS 720

Although not explored, there are times I have during many straight hours of testing that I thought I saw 'Diurnal' effects exhibited from the circuits. In one case a self-running oscillator that would run for 30+ minutes at night, would not run during the day. This was NOT the result of any type of radio interference so we won't even go there. This is an area that needs looking into but must be done in a controlled way to insure you use the exact circuit under the exact conditions, including your ambient temperature and lighting conditions. In my case when using 1N4148's it was even necessary to paint over the clear glass so the they did not react to the light.

This would be interesting if someone did show such effects.

[DrStiffler]

@retrod
Thank you. You're so right. Those LEDs do have some "heat" when I am in direct view of them. I dont know why but when I was recording for the youtube I notice that for the rest of the next day I have this "warm felling" right in my eyes like when you go skying in the mountan and forget the eye gear and the next day, oh boy, your face is so red....

@all
just a point that I learned this year. Do you know those craizy scientists that claims they know the secret but guess what they lost their "notes", including Tesla. Well, this year I decide to keep a almost "religious" process in document and noting everything I am doing (so many projects, so many notes) in plain paper notebook followed by good pictures and now the "my precious" youtube for the videos. I can not stress how important is to go back to those notes and "re-believe" what I discovered and have done.

As one example, I still have a few videos and notes describing in detail how to run this one experiment where my battery runs this "circuit" , make noises, run things and never, I say, NEVER run my 5hAmp battery down, which is the source of the circuit. Unbelieaveble. I had to return to those notes so many times and the videos to be sure that I really did what I am saying.

So guys, can you please make notes and possibly post here sometimes? (no criticism here, I am just serious about it, after all we ARE making history now).

Fausto.

A noted fact is that under the right conditions I have determined that certain white LEDS in theses circuits will emit detectable UV levels. It is no joke that the LEDS should not be looked directly into even it they are not emitting UV. It is well noted that eye damage is possible from high intensity light such as the white LEDS.

[dean_mcgowan]

Dr Stiffler,

Please repost your you tube videos. My memory is fading and I would like to recheck for signs of OU.

Cheers,

Dean

[dean_mcgowan]

Stiffler  et al,

I concur, staring at artificial bright light is bad for the eyes.

Very ouchy ....

Something else will make you go blind, though this forum is not dedicated to such topics...

Regards,

Dean

[Localjoe]

... I found this pertaining to a few of my experiments... but it may help you folks as well for another idea.