Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[amigo]

oh, It's way more fun to reinvent the wheel   ha ha ha 

but, sorry, I don't see what you mean by Tesla's patent.

EM

Looking at one patent won't help, and neither will only looking at its illustrations. You have to read the text and then some more because Tesla's diagrams have simplified symbols for many complex elements, as you can see in the image you have attached.

In truth, some cross-reference between various patents is necessary to understand some of those illustrations before a conclusion can be drawn...

[Bruce_TPU]

@emdevices
congratulations you have reinvented the wheel, unfortunately tesla perfected this circuit 80 years ago. You can find a better circuit here---http://keelynet.com/tesla/---- patent 462418. Read the patent and you should understand that this "IS" Dr.Stifflers circuit only it uses a spark gap, the spark gap is an open capacitor just like the leads of Dr.Stifflers secondary coil windings. Tesla understood the shortcomings of the spark gap and produced a better version of patent 462418 in patent 568177. So you should understand that Dr.Stifflers circuit and yours are not new or unique, and we don't need to reinvent the wheel its already been done.

@ allcanadian

It is good to mention Tesla and patent numbers, etc.  But there is no need for the amount of sarcasm and cynicism in your post.  Both the good Dr. and EM as well as others are working hard on this circuit and ways to improve it.  Adding to this endeavour by pointing out other works in this area, to be read and studied is fine.  But I for one have grown sick and tired of the uncalled for sarcasm toward hard working experimenters, by a select few members of this forum.  It does not make you look intelligent.  Quite the opposite.

Enough said.  I'd hate to reinvent the wheel.

Many thanks,
Bruce

[EMdevices]

*removed* EM

[EMdevices]

*removed* EM

[allcanadian]

@btentzer
I agree that sarcasm and belittement of others is uncalled for , If I offended anyone I am sorry.

@Emdevices
I just want to ask an honest question, do you really believe your circuit could go overunity with all the inherent resistance, voltage drops and phase differentials? We know conventional circuits do not work--they never have and never will but we just keep doing the same thing over and over. I had a question along time ago and tesla answered it, my question was where are the losses?  Tesla told me all resistence is overcome by having the voltage raise itself as in a collapsing magnetic field, the voltage rise proportional to the resistence negating all resistence. He told me a unidirectional pulse fed into an open circuit will be forced to radiate its energy, the collapse of this electric field is associated with EM energy. That phase differentials loads the source in AC circuits and this can be overcome by inserting a capacitor to feed an open isolated circuit or a tank circuit including the load. That any open circuit including one wire acting as a capacitance can have all loads act as a capacitance, circulating current within a tank circuit can be maintained by voltage rise but not effect the source of that voltage rise as it is included in an open circuit in a resonant system.
I am not here to belittle anyone I am here to help if I can, all I ask is that you consider the fact that there may be better ways of doing things, non-conventional ways developed by tesla.