Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[abassign]

@all

A certain Russian scientist called Stanislav Avramenko in 1993 has performed an energy transmission experiment without return to mass, that is with an only cable, with very low losses and very high energy density respect the conductor's area.
The experiment is very simple, from a side is a generator with perticolar characteristics which finishes with an only thread, this, much thin and completely isolated by earth, there it takes the current (if we can so call her) towards the utilzer. A rectifier system by fast diodes and a condenser complete everything. Some time ago the experiment was much advertised, French Jean Louis Naudin has been repeated and documented by a researcher (JLN).

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/afep012.htm

Since the beginning of the Stiffler experiment I have thought to a similitude between this experiment with Avramenko experiment. This similitude can help us to reflect on the characteristics of the experiment and the better one road to reproduce and optimize it. 

[abassign]

@ All

I add also the USA Stanislav Avramenko patent. Must however pay attention to the thin explored fact that she has never been at the end the Avramenko experiment. For instance few researchers have worried of the fact that the thread of transmission of the current can be extremely thin, it calls of one little passage of electrons.
This would confirm the experiment with an oscillator and the 9V battery. I would like to know whether other have done the experiment with the oscillator and 9 V battery and they have observed a greater duration of the battery.

[samedsoft]

@all

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/afep012.htm

Since the beginning of the Stiffler experiment I have thought to a similitude between this experiment with Avramenko experiment. This similitude can help us to reflect on the characteristics of the experiment and the better one road to reproduce and optimize it. 

  So Do You Think Dr. Stiffler actually replicated a Russian Scientist work?

  Dr. Stiffler, you are a good man World will know you as a good man, life is short and you have very good respect and honor within this international community. You have very creative soul and please try to be more open...,

All

   Please check http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~wwieser/elec/oscillator/LTC1799/ adress for a very compact low cost oscillator based on LTC1799. this design is a small footprint 50% duty cycle square wave oscillator with variable frequency from 10kHz to 30MHz

   Best Regards from Turkey

[abassign]

I want to remind you that Stiffler calls his experiment (http://www.drstiffler.com/): "Single Wire Excitation and Amplification", Avramenko entitles his patent as: "Method and apparatus for single line electrical trasmission". The difference of the two names is born of the fact that Avramenko concentrates his research in a system of current transmission with only one wire, Stiffler, tries the transmission of the current and also to obtain his amplification.

There are very much difference between the Stiffler experiment and Avramenko experiment, for instance:

1. The frequency of the oscillator in the Stiffler experiment is 1000 times more high.
2. The form of the envelopments that Stiffler uses for L2-L3 is completely different. The Stiffler envelopments have an only connected terminal, the other is left free!
3. How for the wires which transports the current in the Avramenko experiment, the L2 thickness is extremely thin and is theoretically not sufficient for the current necessary to power 50 LEDs (50 * 20 mA = 1 A).

@plengo
Is it possible repeat your experiment using a much thinner wire which connects the generator of signals with the device and verify his heating for Joule effect? Actually the adopted disposition in your experiment is the most like that of Avramenko, however it lacks the transformer.

@k4zep
Like the experiment of Stiffler, but with a few not clear differences, can you do us an electric scheme?

@amigo
Your experiment is the several equal to the one realized by Stiffler with the oscillator, have fact of the progress?

[tinu]

...
3. How for the wires which transports the current in the Avramenko experiment, the L2 thickness is extremely thin and is theoretically not sufficient for the current necessary to power 50 LEDs (50 * 20 mA = 1 A).

What?!
The LEDs are series connected, aren't they?