Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[DrStiffler]

The new Reactor Cell appears to have serious problems with stainless steel. After a 6 hour run a new bolt and nut were destroyed as seen in the following pictures. I have never had this happen wit SS before in any of my cells, but of course the reactor is a bit different.

[fritz]

I have never had this happen wit SS before in any of my cells, but of course the reactor is a bit different.

(micro)Cavitation is a good sign but a huge problem.

BTW: impressing.

rgds.


Or should we call it (nano)cavitation

[Shanti]

Well I also just replicated your electrolysis circuit. What can I say: It works...
After some testing one thing really showed up: This thing doesn't behave as a normal electrolysis would!
It is far not as distance and water resistance dependable as normal electrolysis.

The funny thing is, after I charged some water by hangig some single HV DC wire in a bottle, and took the wire out again, I realized what static electricity is, after I touched the water...OUCH...(it seems water has quite some static capacity)
This was a long time ago. I then thought, what if one does do electrolysis like that. Which means charge the water through a wire and then discharge it again through another wire. But one after the other, not at the same time. Like that it will never be possible that some current will flow through the water. But as I'm actually a very busy man, I didn't ever try to actually build a circuit for tests...It seems now, that I should have done it...But thanks to you, I now have. For as I see it, this is exactly what your circuit does. What do you think about it?
And when I look at your circuit I have to say, some little modifications, and you have a Stan Meyer Circuit.

But one thing I observed while measuring the circuit with my oscilloscopse. In my circuit the voltage spike on the transistor collector gets easily up and above 100V. And the transistor is actually only made to withstand 100V. So the transistor is really running at the limit...
The voltage levels on the electrolysis electrodes actually show, that due to the fact that one now does not allow current to flow from one electrode to the other at the same time, it is now possible to charge the water to high voltage levels (in my case 50V), but without the problem of an excessive current flowing.
Now, what could we expect if we drive the voltage levels up to 40kV like Stan Meyer did... 

[DrStiffler]

Well I also just replicated your electrolysis circuit. What can I say: It works...
After some testing one thing really showed up: This thing doesn't behave as a normal electrolysis would!
It is far not as distance and water resistance dependable as normal electrolysis.

The funny thing is, after I charged some water by hangig some single HV DC wire in a bottle, and took the wire out again, I realized what static electricity is, after I touched the water...OUCH...(it seems water has quite some static capacity)
This was a long time ago. I then thought, what if one does do electrolysis like that. Which means charge the water through a wire and then discharge it again through another wire. But one after the other, not at the same time. Like that it will never be possible that some current will flow through the water. But as I'm actually a very busy man, I didn't ever try to actually build a circuit for tests...It seems now, that I should have done it...But thanks to you, I now have. For as I see it, this is exactly what your circuit does. What do you think about it?
And when I look at your circuit I have to say, some little modifications, and you have a Stan Meyer Circuit.

But one thing I observed while measuring the circuit with my oscilloscopse. In my circuit the voltage spike on the transistor collector gets easily up and above 100V. And the transistor is actually only made to withstand 100V. So the transistor is really running at the limit...
The voltage levels on the electrolysis electrodes actually show, that due to the fact that one now does not allow current to flow from one electrode to the other at the same time, it is now possible to charge the water to high voltage levels (in my case 50V), but without the problem of an excessive current flowing.
Now, what could we expect if we drive the voltage levels up to 40kV like Stan Meyer did... 

@Shanti
If you really want to charge the water in your cell you can also turn it into a pretty good capacitor with Na2B4O7 (Sodium tetraborate decahydrate) or common Borax. A dielectric film will form on most electrodes and the cell can hold a very good charge. I have indeed been brought back to reality a number of time when I forget and disconnect with both leads, (dumb idea anyway).

My web site is now only up on weekends (extreme cost of utility power), but you might want to check in on a weekend and get an update, even though it is still about 4 months behind the work.

[Shanti]

I will look at your site. Thank you.

Well I just replaced the coil, with a  much bigger one (0.3H). And LOL, if the readings on my power supply would be correct, I now generate electricity ( - 0.07A, before I had +0.05A) LOL (and this is quite a professional power supply)
Sure this reading is a measurement error due to the HF impulses. But now I can understand why so many people with other devices are so easily convinced they developed an OU device...and then disappointed if they are not able to close the loop...
If only I had more time...