Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

[DrStiffler]

Hi Dr. Stiffler,

DAMN good to see you did quit us.  I agree with your measurements and thank you for the "worst case" numbers. I understand perfectly. My lousy board appears to be running at about a worse case as it can but the current and voltages I see across the LEDs agree with your numbers perfectly.  I'm sort of busy today with family matters so experimenting time is short.  More of that tonight.

  It would appear that with the basic ON BOARD RF Osc. driver, you have the ability to generate 3X as much energy through/into the LEDs as the Osc. uses.  Your numbers are absolutely worst case! A really good question that you have addressed before and is very difficult to measure, is:  How much of that 300 mw do you actual use in the conversion process?  From what I can tell, it is almost nil!  I also assume the impedance converter you are talking about is a step up RF transformer to get as high a p/p RF to the BF xformer.  In you basic L/C input circuit, this seems to do that also at resonance.  Keep up the great work! 

Now how much current @ 12VDC does that darn solar panel put out when illuminated via thos LEDs?  There is so much loss here.   I know patience is a virtue! 

Ben 

@All

Let me post some worst case figures for you to look over. My single coil, driven by a Colpitts Oscillator drawing 5mA into an impedance converter drawing 20mA from 12 volts.

12 x 2.5E-2 = 0.300 or 300 mW input.

Driving 75 LEDS in series with a forward drop each of 3.2 -3.8 volts with 4mA in the series chain. Lets use the low forward drop;

75 x 3.2 = 240 volts therefore 240 x 4E-3 = 0.960 or 960 mW

Do you all understand? and this is worst case.

@k4zep

You are correct that it is very difficult to measure input, that is a sticking point with the so called geniuses. Let me address something in this same sentence  so it will not stand out and get all worked up. I have many times seen the energy flowing back into the impedance driver from the coil. More energy than going in, but wasted as it is dumped. So do not be at all surprised if you see this condition, your not nuts.

No, what I mean by impedance driver is the MOSFET that drives the coil that is in turn driven by the oscillator. The load on the oscillator if you tried to direct couple it is to great and it will not stay in oscillation and/or tune properly. The MOSFET forms the buffer between the oscillator and the coil and also better matched the coil input.

The solar cell, well I have been trying to keep my web site in sync and it is close, but still catching up. That first solar cell is a JOKE and I told the manufacture as much. In full sun the TOY could only generate 30mA. I do have the start of the info on my site at the bottom of the page. In short, to make it work you will need the best cell you can get, I will give examples and you will need to play with some small mirrors to use all the light, but that is later right?

[SpongeDave]

I do not apologize to anyone for my attitude as I have paid my dues and spent most of my life trying to absorb knowledge. If I get frustrated by those that might want to avoid the work and be handed something without effort on their part then indeed I do get livid.

This list and the people that have and are working on replications may very well be the people that make a difference for billions of people, which I can not do without their help. I am most adamant about a step at a time and not wasting time going into some radio transmitter myth.

Those that wish to, lets move forward, be a part of History, don't sit back and wait for #10, it can not come without support by the simple replications and removal of the basic objections. Scientists do not want to touch this. It should only takes days, not months or years once you commit and do.

Thank you, you are generous to post your research so openly, and I agree with you on the difference it will make.  Do you place all of your research in the public domain, and relinquish any claim on the apparatus and its variations?  You say "simple replications" and you are even careful not to frame the 'validators' as 'contributors', but what about those who stumble upon more complex improvements.  Is not your work an improvement on anothers?  Isn't your device an accident?  Can you explain the principle of its operation?

[DrStiffler]

I do not apologize to anyone for my attitude as I have paid my dues and spent most of my life trying to absorb knowledge. If I get frustrated by those that might want to avoid the work and be handed something without effort on their part then indeed I do get livid.

This list and the people that have and are working on replications may very well be the people that make a difference for billions of people, which I can not do without their help. I am most adamant about a step at a time and not wasting time going into some radio transmitter myth.

Those that wish to, lets move forward, be a part of History, don't sit back and wait for #10, it can not come without support by the simple replications and removal of the basic objections. Scientists do not want to touch this. It should only takes days, not months or years once you commit and do.

Thank you, you are generous to post your research so openly, and I agree with you on the difference it will make.  Do you place all of your research in the public domain, and relinquish any claim on the apparatus and its variations?  You say "simple replications" and you are even careful not to frame the 'validators' as 'contributors', but what about those who stumble upon more complex improvements.  Is not your work an improvement on anothers?  Isn't your device an accident?  Can you explain the principle of its operation?

>> Do you place all of your research in the public domain, and relinquish any claim on the apparatus and its variations?
I most certainly DO!, if I had planned to make money from it you would never have been told about it.

>>You say "simple replications" and you are even careful not to frame the 'validators' as 'contributors', but what about those who stumble upon more complex improvements
Oh a linguist you are, how can we twist words. You know exactly what I stated. How can anyone construe this to mean I would take any achievement from anyone else? 

>>Is not your work an improvement on anothers?
Some others and I make full disclosure on my web site.

>> Isn't your device an accident?
Oh yes of course I just happened to stumble across a silly configuration of a circuit as I have presented.

>>Can you explain the principle of its operation?
I do think so and a paper will be offered for publication when I am ready.

Oh by the way, are you a vortex member???

[SpongeDave]

Well it looks like I misjudged you!

Let me be the first to say that you ROCK!

Also, you are certainly not a fraud.

(But c'mon, that logo...)

[DrStiffler]

Well it looks like I misjudged you!

Let me be the first to say that you ROCK!

Also, you are certainly not a fraud.

(But c'mon, that logo...)

>>(But c'mon, that logo...)
So what is wrong with my bird? That I will sell to you.