Single Wire Tests

[BEP]

I replaced the 'wire' and the opposite LED glowed brighter.  I repeated this several times and it happened every time. 

When the unexpected LED was brighter did you see if that magnetic field was weaker or gone?

If there is current flow there must be a magnetic field, right?

[hansvonlieven]

Oh, I forgot to post my results of a further test of this experiment.  The single wire appears to generate no magnetic field.  (But I think I need to redo this test because I used stronger batteries and no LEDs or bulbs.)

G'day Rosphere,

This is exactly what I would have suspected.

By having two opposing currents going down the same wire you have effectively created bi-filar behaviour in a single conductor.

This needs a lot of further investigation, what you have discovered here is not in the standard textbooks. I think it has implications right down the line.

At the risk of making a complete and utter goose of myself I would say that you have created something akin to what Keely calls a "Neutral Centre". This neutral centre, according to Keely, is the key to limitless energy.

This research you guys are doing transcends by a long shot the parameters of this thread. I leave it up to you to follow up or to relegate this thing to a new thread.

I am happy to start one if you wish, my personal feeling is to keep it here.

Hans von Lieven

[Bruce_TPU]

You know, I was thinking about all of the SM clues, about rotation.  We know there is a gyroscopic effect caused by rotation in two directions.  For some time, we thought perhaps the top and bottom are pulsed in one direction and the middle pulsed in the other.  We even looked at video, where SM motions both directions in one of the tapes.

BUT... what if, SM discovered that the way to "disable the EFFECTS of the flux, so that now the electrons float freely" was as simple as sending the identical frequencies in opposite directions?  One power source sends them all clockwise and another oscillator and power source (two batteries) sends identical signals counterclockwise?  This would give you the counter rotating fields, and (perhaps, needs more testing) this is how SM disabled the effects of the flux?

Cheers,

Bruce

[BEP]

It is in the books but it is part of that one-size-fits-all EM theory that we all suffer from.

The U.S. National Electric Code allows for the use of a much smaller neutral point in three phase systems. Why ? - because a balanced load causes lower amperage in the neutral than the phases. Sometimes it is not even there. The single phase loads are there. Where did the amps go? Everybody does it but noone asks.

The answer is usually a busy depiction of vector phase relationships. I say, OK. Now why am I seeing 65 VDC between the generator shaft and ground? The generator is polyphase AC. The answer is - fix that! that can cause problems.

I think if you displace/remove/compress - whatever - the magnetic field the dielectric field fills in the void. Radiant energy is DC (avoiding the fact that DC doesn't really exist). It either radiates or it doesn't.

So that one little wire test is key to understanding cancellation of fields, the DC portion, increase is speed and possibly rotation of fields and gain?

BEP

[Jdo300]

Hi jason
that looks suspicious and awesome! 
how many sources are you planning to use?
also tubes or transistors?
i am intrested in your test results.

Hi Marco,

I am going to wind the iron coil and then wait for a bit. Yes I will be driving with tubes because Steven was trying to get us to see some thing about tubes that we all have been ignoring. I have a set of 12J5 triodes that I am going to build a three-channel amplifier with to pulse the stew out of this coil when it's finished. But for now, I'm waiting for some tube sockets to come in .

God Bless,
Jason O