Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single Wire Tests

Started by duff, October 31, 2007, 03:42:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosphere

Quote from: BEP on January 22, 2008, 09:05:47 PM
Quote from: Rosphere on January 22, 2008, 06:50:52 PM
I replaced the 'wire' and the opposite LED glowed brighter.  I repeated this several times and it happened every time.

When the unexpected LED was brighter did you see if that magnetic field was weaker or gone?

If there is current flow there must be a magnetic field, right?


Sorry, BEP, I used a small compass to detect the magnetic fields in a similar experiment with no LEDs.  When the LED's were in use my small compass would not budge either way.  I suspect that the current was too weak after passing through the LED's.   :(

armagdn03

Quote from: duff on October 31, 2007, 03:42:00 AM
Erfinder once said: "Study comes first and then construction! How can you build what you don't understand?".

I was going back through Steven Marks statements and the following got me thinking again. No one has a definitive answer for what the kick is.

SM: I told you that the simplest form of over unity is a piece of wire and a voltage source. Anyone can actually connect it and measure. See for yourself the kick. NO coil no xmrs, just a kick. That should tell you learned gentleman that there exists a form of energy convertible and useable which is directly related to a simple piece of wire and instantaneous electron flow.

The following is my effort to understand the kick using a straight piece of wire.


A possible solution to the kick.

Multiplication of power = multiplication of motion = high voltage.

All circuits contain both induction and capacitance. even a straight wire.  When power is first applied, maximum resistance is found in high induction circuits, which still have some capacitance. The capacitance absorbs the current, and expels it back into the inductance. the first action is energy stuffed into an extreemly small capacitance. Tesla followers should note this. Notice that the kick, is "electrostatic" in nature according to everybodies observations. Think about this, and you will know exactly what the kick is. Also, one might try to apply Bernulli's principle to this problem (really weird I know, but after all this is fluid dynamics at its best.), the higher the inductance, the higher the kick.....why? what does high inductance represent in the face of change?

Also, why has nobody taken a look at the force between charges recently? force decreases with the square of the distance, what doe this imply? A linear increase in voltage = a non linear, (squared) function??? HELLO!!!

Avramenko, Tesla, Frolov = one wire = super conduction at room temp.

this one is gold: EMF reproduces itself through induction, and dissipates itself through condution. How can we induct power instead of conducting it?
I wish I could turn my brain off sometimes, then I could get some sleep.

BEP

Quote from: Rosphere on January 24, 2008, 05:48:15 PM

Sorry, BEP, I used a small compass to detect the magnetic fields in a similar experiment with no LEDs.  When the LED's were in use my small compass would not budge either way.  I suspect that the current was too weak after passing through the LED's.   :(

I should have assumed that. Sorry. Yes the LEDs would not provide enough current and mag field to deflect a compass.
If you have enough battery power left you could up the amps with additional resistors and probably make a detectable mag field. I would try each lamp circuit separate first then have both on and check.

jeanna

Hello All,
I don't know where else to post this so here it is.

I replicated Marco's 1st experiment a and b .

I used 2 batteries each made up of 2 AAA NiMH batteries recently recharged (around 2.65vdc each ) The lights I used were red LED's.

I burned out a LED very quickly last night so began again more cautiously today.
Part a was easy after I got the new led ready. Very quickly I checked it all out and both lights went on but they were flickery. (The flickery part could be because the contacts were made using twisted wires and clips) I checked the voltage in the middle section (the part with the ?) and got 0.010-0.012vdc (Each battery by itself looked about right but I forgot to record it - sorry)

Part b When the thing was full on the voltage from end to end was 0.010vdc-0.012vdc just like the middle section of the a part. Each battery and its loop showed voltage of 0.234vdc. The batteries got really hot really fast so I pulled the batteries off. Then I rechecked the batteries separately and each battery is exactly 2.61vdc. (I didn't think to record what each battery was before the test see above-sorry. )

jeanna

BEP

@Jeanna

If the circuit was right then the polarity of one of your battery sets was wrong. It sounds like each battery was trying to eat the other's tail  :)

LEDs typically don't like voltages as high as 2.6. You'll have to look at the package they came in for their voltages. Usually you must add a resistor in series.