Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Self Running Micro TPU, with closed loop.

Started by EMdevices, November 12, 2007, 11:49:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

4Tesla

@btentzer
Since the circuit uses a pot, you should be able to get a good range in frequency.. including 7.23 and 7.3hz.  The calculations are based on a conventional RC filter circuit.. I don't know if the trigger coil has an effect on the frequency or not.

Good Luck.. I can't wait to get the cores so I can join in on the fun!  :)

Edit.. I was thinking maybe the direction the coil is wound effects witch way the transistor goes in the circuit.  Also you will need to measure the frequency somehow to adjust the pot to the right frequency.. does your DMM measure frequency?

Edit2.. I calculated the range for 100k pot in series with 1k res.. 101k - 4.8hz and 1k - 482.5hz

Edit3.. If you can't measure the frequency, I calculated the values needed.. you can use your meter to measure the resistance of the pot.. 64k - 7.5hz, 66k - 7.3hz, and 67k - 7.2hz... Also you can replace the 1k res with a 62k res and the 100k pot with a 10k pot for finner tuning.

Edit4.. I almost forgot, you need to subtract 1k because of the 1k resistor.. so for 7.5hz the pot resistance would need to be 63k and not 64k.

Edit5.. RC parts list:
  Potentiometers - 10K, and 100K
  Resistors - 1K, and 62K
  Capacitor - .33uF

Edit6.. What is the diameter of your toroid?

Thanks,
4Tesla




quantum1024


There is no way to have OU with this circuit without applying an outside input, which is why I mentioned it a couple pages back that a pulser motor was needed to maintain both charging and recycling charge. I'm almost done both the pulser/flywheel and the circuit. should be interesting. This circuit is unique in that it uses least amount of parts to get the job done (efficiency) and configurable. The pulser/flywheel should produce that extra time increase by maintaining the charge duration in any case.

P.S. does anyone know of an electronic circuit equivalent of a mechanical flywheel? is there even one? I was thinking of capacitor/coil combinations, but it does not exactly show both mass, centrifugal force and angular momentum ? or do I have the wrong idea here?

4Tesla

@quantum1024

I like your avatar!!  :)

4Tesla

hakware

A quick way to see if its getting excess power is to calculate how much power the led is using. is that not the load?
it seems that a 22uf capacitor should not blink an led for that long under any circumstance. The problem is that every led is different and not a precision device as far as current drain forward voltage drop etc.  That could be reasoning that were seeing such wild and varying run times.

anyone have a current probe on their scope to figure out what the power factor on this is?


4Tesla

Yep, the LED is the load.  You can hook your meter in series to get the current.

4Tesla