SMOT TEST- can someone do this?

[Low-Q]

infnite smot works. no ramps needed
I posted this picture long time ago

I haven't build it cause it obviously works.
Who doesn't see it as over 100% working should change forum
immidiately.

many experiments like this confirms it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKyGDWeblQw&feature=related

infinite smot is based on rail or gauss gun.


whiz

That experiment does not confirm overunity. This drawing you have there should be easy to build. So you might build one and show us the result?
Edit: B1 and B2 will not stay in those positions, but some distance before as the flux density is less at the ends than it is a little earlier. B3 must therfor have enough power to push B1 beyond that point. and the energy provided by the acceleration of B3 will not be enough to close the loop


Br.

Vidar

[The Eskimo Quinn]

I am a little lost on all the talk about cof E, conservation of Energy only applies to energy you produce or acquire and the math against losses to friction etc added to the transfer to your device.

over 30 percent of all electricity produced at the power station is lost before it reaches your home.
these are calculations relevent to normal production transfers of energy "created" which in itself is a silly term for a petrol generator if all energy already exists.

my point being is that cofE is not a usable part of your calculation, gravity is a primary part of your calculations (not counting the strange horizontal diagram).in simple terms

EG:C is first object/device and  if A equals energy and A is transferred to B with no losses (mythical frictionless device) Then c equals zero A and B equals the amount originally in C. Correct?? not complicated, not difficult to understand.

if C equals gravity it cannot be lost, because any gain is free if you can manipulate the lift against it, you cannot conserve or lose something you cannot remove, albeit that this is the only power source or Energy type that this applies to, it does not apply in petrol generators, it does not apply in solar or any other form of power generation save hydroelectricity, where if the water was pumped up, this would be your manipulation of lift.

the only conservation of energy from momentum would be if it was entirely lateral or horizontal.

So whilst c of E does apply to your forward momentum, it cannot be calculated as being a source of energy you provided that dissapears or is used up, trying to calculate an angular fall or rise of a rolling ball using c of e is near impossible even at NASA.

take your car and your front wheels, have you ever seen, and i mean ever on any science program, even in digital bullsh1t form, a car seat that has a shock absorber system where the seat travels down toward the front wheels or the inertia point?? why not, it's very simple math isn't it? very simple mechanics according to this thread?? we wouldn't even need seat belts, we simply have a braking system that could stop the car (less skid) at the exact point the brakes are touched, instant stop vehicle. it hasn't been tried not because of lack of mechanics, but because the calculations for c of e on an angular rise or fall are near impossible to calculate even at a fixed speed and set weight.

no tyre compnay in the world ever used this to develop a tyre, they used polymer compound and wall structure and tested it. because the anomalies are too great, as are each of your friction componenets.

Theory is for girls, men build. this is cheap toy stuff, do not give me time and money stories, this is cheap and simple for each of the designs proposed, for those with the mouths, show us at least you jpeg photos. if you are simply an unhelpful person to those trying to use the thread, you should leave.

My advice is simple, do not reply to negative posts, do not reply to theory that does not have a physical description to go with the math, and as this really is about the cheapest trial theory on this site, everyone who claims to be building should have a 2 week period from entry to the thread to post the pictures or be considered a bored housewife using an alias.

I am not a builder of these devices, although was happy to give the aerial placement a key to removing the magnetic hold problem. I just get a little tired of those who having nothing constructive to add to a reasonable attempt at PM. For the builders who have spent the time and effort may success be your.

[tinu]

infnite smot works. no ramps needed
...
I haven't build it cause it obviously works.
...
whiz

[tinu]

@ Mr. Entropy,

Many thanks. Point taken. My mistake.
(A little bit of excuse would sound like: ?no other maxima? instead of ?no other inflexion points? but it would still not solve the case).

Respectfully,
Tinu

[Paul-R]

infnite smot works. no ramps needed
I posted this picture long time ago
I haven't build it cause it obviously works.
Who doesn't see it as over 100% working should change forum
immediately.
many experiments like this confirms it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKyGDWeblQw&feature=related
infinite smot is based on rail or gauss gun.
whiz

Yes - but - the purpose of this site is to extract energy. Your design needs some sort of
output shaft. Could the balls be magnets, and pass through coils which generate electricity?
If the consequent Lenz Law resistance is reasonable, it would not come to a halt.
Paul.