Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

Started by Craigy, January 04, 2008, 04:11:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 38 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

@btentzer,

Thanks. That's a simple but important test. It'd be interesting to see @fritz' method too. One really needs to know what the exact form of the concrete field is in a given rendition of, say, Torbay motor. Difficulties in achieving symmetricity of the fields is the main problem in making these motors work as well as the proper ratio of the magnetic induction. The hope is that this particular proposal for a magnet motor solving these issues will be easier.

I think your point about the strength of the rotor vs. stator magnets is very important. In the setup I have with me right now the rotor magnets are stronger than the stator ones which is the opposite of what @alsetalokin had said it should be. I don't know what it is in the other set up which showed promising results because it isn't with me right now.

I'm using magnets with the exact part number recommended. However, as I recall @alsetalokin has assembled his machine with magnets lying around in his lab not knowing what their origin or part number is. I think the recommended part number was his best guess, am I right. We have to clarify this problem very well because having proper magnets is the gist of the effort.

Maybe everyone else should check what the strength of their rotor vs. stator magnets is.

Omnibus

@fritz,

Speaking of simulation with electromagnets, please, take a look at this simulation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tknwdltnB6s

sterlinga

Quote from: vipond50 on January 19, 2008, 04:49:09 PM
I have include a short Video of all three Stators operating in syc.
Need to upgrade this camera, to much time in the field I guess.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tTFdiryJyQ

Regards
Bill

Feature page created here:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:MPMM:Replications:vipond50
http://freeenergynews.com and http://peswiki.com
"The best cutting-edge, clean energy news and directory service on the net."

sterlinga

Quote from: vipond50 on January 19, 2008, 06:40:27 PM
Ok, i will quit posting any information to the Group.
I will leave it up to the Group  to decide?

Bill

Bill, I think you should continue to post your observations.  If you were the only one reporting any degree of success, then I think Shirikawa's skepticism would be more founded.  But there are several others reporting a degree of success here, beginning with CLaNZeR.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:MPMM:Replications

My count is five, holding CLaNZeR's as being foremost in being convincing, showing accelleration, albeit for only a couple of seconds.

That's from what has been reported here at OverUnity on this thread, which is really the only place I've been watching as it seems to be the most comprehensive while being minimal in fighting and rudeness that I found at the Steorn forum (primarily from Al and OC).

Perhaps this will be a good way for you to redeem yourself and show your credibility.  I personally still tend to believe that there is something to the Joe Cell phenomenon, and I do not doubt that you had what you claimed to have a couple of years ago.  It has been disapointing that others have not been able to replicate this to a point of stability and reproducibility.

Sterling D. Allan
http://freeenergynews.com and http://peswiki.com
"The best cutting-edge, clean energy news and directory service on the net."

bhaas

Quote

Bill, I think you should continue to post your observations.  If you were the only one reporting any degree of success, then I think Shirikawa's skepticism would be more founded.  But there are several others reporting a degree of success here, beginning with CLaNZeR.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:MPMM:Replications

My count is five, holding CLaNZeR's as being foremost in being convincing, showing accelleration, albeit for only a couple of seconds.

That's from what has been reported here at OverUnity on this thread, which is really the only place I've been watching as it seems to be the most comprehensive while being minimal in fighting and rudeness that I found at the Steorn forum (primarily from Al and OC).

Perhaps this will be a good way for you to redeem yourself and show your credibility.  I personally still tend to believe that there is something to the Joe Cell phenomenon, and I do not doubt that you had what you claimed to have a couple of years ago.  It has been disapointing that others have not been able to replicate this to a point of stability and reproducibility.

Sterling D. Allan

The main reason why no one has been able to duplicate anything is because most
(99.9975643%) of the people on the JC groups are more concerned with making
bubbles then actually putting the JC on a car. It's the same silly nonsense and questions
over and over and over again. It's a vicious cycle in the JC groups. Very sad.

Brad