Working Magnetic Motor on you tube??

[Harvey]

The stroboscopic shots are disappointing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-McMAqt04Q

I went through 50MB of frames and picked out the ones clear enough to ID the parts involved.

This was a GW 'sync' and as the strobes show, it was far from sync'd.  There is obviously a lot of shear and possibly even some of those vortices Faraday & OC have envisioned.

Tomorrow I'll run some dual trace tests and confirm what I see here. Also, I'm going to try out my Camcorder, I'm pretty sure it has a 25K FPS setting but I will have to wait a few days to get it uploaded as the card for that is not installed atm.

Strobe Test:

Cheers,

Harvey

[sveinutne]

I'll be back after the Strobe uploads.

Cheers,

Harvey

That will be really interesting, because there is a lot of wonder how the magnet on the stator is oriented in the AGW lock on the closest pas of the rotor magnet.
I think they are N to N and S to S, so the magnets are weaken at that point.
Svein

[ebswift]

Steorn's online again.

[Grimer]

I thought the following post from the fizzx.com forum might be of interest to overunity forum members who would like to know more about the builder of the OCAL device.

It is taken from a thread discussing the existence or otherwise of a Steorn Jury. As you can see it was written just before the abortive Steorn demonstration at the Kinetica Museum, London.

==============================================================
http://fizzx.com/viewtopic.php?p=1564&highlight=#1564

alsetalokin -  Mon Jul 02 -  2007 - 3:31 pm     

==============================================================

Let's see--a number of points to be addressed.
The person to whom I referred was contracted and funded by a wealthy private individual to set up and administer a laboratory to subsidize, examine and hopefully confirm claims and research proposals in the area loosely termed "free energy", alternative propulsion, and anti-gravity. During the two or three years that the funding lasted, I worked closely in conjunction with this person. We examined quite a few claims and devices in the areas listed, funded several inventors, and paid for visits from several other internationally known inventors of these kinds of devices. Unfortunately and quite disappointingly, none of the projects we examined or funded produced positive results. It is important to note here that we were NOT set up to debunk the claims; on the contrary we were trying hard to get to something real and workable. Unfortunately, since we were/are scientists first and foremost, we had to apply the scientific method in an unbiased manner, and so we were able to identify fraud, prevarication, and error many times, but never any workable devices.
I have mentioned the jury member before, in an old post somewhere, so this info isn't new here, it is just an expansion in answer to the original question at the head of this thread.
It isn't pretentious garbage; I haven't come across anyone with anything like the credentials of the person referred to in this area, with one exception: my most recent employer, who also must remain nameless. You of course can believe whatever you will, but I have been fortunate enough to have been actually making my living working in the "free energy" field for over 7 years now, and as long as the checks keep clearing, I can't agree with the "pretentious garbage" characterization.
Nor, of course, am I Sean's stooge. From the experience I have accumulated, my position is clear: Steorn must almost certainly be wrong about their claim, for whatever reason, be it fraud, error, or some unfathomable third type of reason.
And, actually, it can be a bit complicated to debunk some types of free-energy devices. Otherwise we wouldn't be seeing so darn many of them on Youtube! Since many of the devices and systems (like certain "cold-fusion" cells, for example) produce small amounts of apparent excess energy, in rather unusual and hard-to-duplicate conditions, real tests of some of these devices may require fabrication and calibration of new types of equipment, expensive and extensive series of control experimentation, travel expenses for the principal researchers involved, and etc. I have detailed some examples of what I mean in other posts, for example the story of excess kinetic energy that took over 10 years to debunk finally.
exco is right that a PMM would probably be easy to debunk; unfortunately I have never been presented with one (although Minato did promise to bring one to our lab, he "forgot" it in Japan and we didn't get to see it). Most of the real labs working in this area (yes, there are several) never get to see anything quite so blatant--because, as exco says, they don't actually work.
Far more common are the devices that are claimed to produce slight increments in energy, slight decrements in weight or mass, slight anomalous thrusts, etc. and these claims are harder to deal with fairly.
==============================================================

It is ironic, but entirely understandable, that Alan should be the person to discover the phenomena embodied in the OCAL device.

[CLaNZeR]

So what happened to CLaNZeR (Sean). He posted on his site http://www.overunity.org.uk
that he got the correct magnets and posted a video of it working (?) or almost working and now all the videos on his site are dead and no updates. Hope he is okay..

I did an update yesterday a couple of threads back and also updated in my forums at http://www.overunity.org.uk
After spending 12 hours in the workshop I needed some sleep hehe

The Videos on the site are down for a bit as trying to keep the bandwidth at a managable level. They are on YouTube to try take the bandwidth away a bit LOL!

Back too it this end with new Rotor I cut yesterday.

Cheers

Sean.