Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



DEBATE THREAD

Started by Bruce_TPU, January 19, 2008, 11:07:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

Quote from: supersam on January 28, 2008, 05:49:39 PM
@omnibus,

SHOW ME THE NUMBERS!!!!!!  WHAT COULD BE SIMPLER? especially forsomeone that has all the answers!

lol
sam
I've shown enough for any knowledgeable person to understand that SMOT violates CoE. Your request is by someone who doesn't know what he's talking about.

supersam















omnibus,

oh is that ever so simple!!  but what else can you expect from a simple mind!  do anything but answer the question.  what a peeon!  don;'t even speculat in your equation? that ___ kg =anything. SHOW ME THE NUMBERS, THEN ATTACK MY CHARACTER!  UNTIL THEN I WILL CONTINUE TO ATTACK YOURS AS WELL AS ANY OTHER, "SO CALLED SCIENTIST" THAT CAN NOT ANSWER MY QUESTION!  have you noticed there is no longer anybody posting here but me and you.  we are waiting for your quantatative prooof!

lol
sam











Omnibus

@supersam,

Stop filling the thread with crap.

supersam

   $$$$$omnibus,

until you,SHOW ME THE NUMBERS THE ONLY ONE SPOUTING CRAP IS YOU!!!!!  your suppossed truth is nothing more than a bunch mathematical gibberish,  that on the one hand you are using to disprove and the other you are using to prove.  you are full of shi@#@$t, until you show me the numbers.  i don't give a damn about your supposed algebraic proofs with no numbers!  they are only as good as 1=2!!!!!!

lol;
sam


















PolyMatrix

This argument is all about where and how you start calculating the input energy and the output energy.

What IS energy? Here is one persons research on the definitions he found. http://www.ftexploring.com/energy/definition.html

Now lets concentrate on the definition of Work.http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/Work/DefinitionWork.html

However it seems that the definition of work has been causing some problems. No work is done if there is no displacement. So pushing a rock that does not move means no work. Which is not that useful for thermodynamics.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0707/0707.3802.pdf

From the above references a picture of confusion starts to emerge. Especially when we are told that magnetic force is a conservative force except when it is varying magnetic field in Maxwell?s Fourth Field Equation. http://phy.duke.edu/courses/042/Lectures/Lecture24.pdf.

At this point I gave up trying to find out how to measure the work done by a magnetic field.