DEBATE THREAD

[supersam]

@psycopath,

i am with you brother!  no matter how crazy it gets.  i am even a beleiver in smot.  i hope you don't think i am crazy.  however, i hope to point out to a few believers in smot, that there are actual numbers out there that will do a lot more for the cause than, a bunch of variables with no reql numbers attached.  variables are always just that, variables, until math reduces them to real numbers.  that is the real point.  what are the real numbers?  now we have a place to start a real debate.  it is really not possible with only a bunch of variables.

lol
sam

ps:  i am sorry, he did use the 1, in his algebraic equations.

[psychopath]

Actually my flight example was perfect, since earlier scientists were convinced that man made flight was impossible. I don't care what the birds did, the people denied it just because many people failed, even though the birds were flying. The wright brothers were regarded as crackpots.

http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_7.htm

And although it was theorized that heavier-than-air flight was possible as early as the 13th century, and in the 16th century Leonardo da Vinci designed winged aircraft and a crude kind of helicopter

Thats 4 centuries before we got off the ground.
Just glad we don't have to rely on waiting for a closed loop SMOT.

Leaornado da vinci? Da vinci never intended to be practical, he was more of an artist, than an inventor. At his time there was no such thing as a motor, and it is highly impractical to use a steam engine with a helicopter. His helicopter doesn't work, it is simply an idea.

His glider was just that, a glider, not a flying machine.

Guess what, my great great grand pa drew a picture of a looped smot, that must mean that everyone accepts the validity of looped smots(sarcasm).

[psychopath]

@psycopath,

i am with you brother!  no matter how crazy it gets.  i am even a beleiver in smot.  i hope you don't think i am crazy.  however, i hope to point out to a few believers in smot, that there are actual numbers out there that will do a lot more for the cause than, a bunch of variables with no reql numbers attached.  variables are always just that, variables, until math reduces them to real numbers.  that is the real point.  what are the real numbers?  now we have a place to start a real debate.  it is really not possible with only a bunch of variables.

lol
sam

ps:  i am sorry, he did use the 1, in his algebraic equations.

I agree. Formulas are somewhat useless until we substitute the real numbers.

[Bessler007]

In a private message, Omnibusted has told me he's going to make good on the emboldened threat below if more people don't start seeing things their way.

They are threatening to post a personal picture.  This could get really ugly.


Bessler007
Cmdr, BHS
mib HQ

@DQ (aka @modervador),

Stop insulting me by ignoring my argument and substituting it by spewing stupidities. You're waging an ad hominem attack at me by continuously cluttering this and other threads with semi-truths and outright lies. This should stop or it will get ugly.  I have no friends but the truth and anyone such as you abusing the truth is my enemy.

[psychopath]

In a private message, Omnibusted has told me he's going to make good on the emboldened threat below if more people don't start seeing things their way.

They are threatening to post a personal picture.  This could get really ugly.


Bessler007
Cmdr, BHS
mib HQ

@DQ (aka @modervador),

Stop insulting me by ignoring my argument and substituting it by spewing stupidities. You're waging an ad hominem attack at me by continuously cluttering this and other threads with semi-truths and outright lies. This should stop or it will get ugly.  I have no friends but the truth and anyone such as you abusing the truth is my enemy.

You sound like a media fear campaign lol