Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thane Heins Perepiteia.

Started by RunningBare, February 04, 2008, 09:02:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 24 Guests are viewing this topic.

polarbreeze

Quote from: OilBarren on March 23, 2008, 09:14:50 AM

MAYBE IT IS AFFECTING THE ROTOR FREQUENCY?


That's basically what I'm saying, Thane. Building on your theory that it's magnetic flux feeding back down the driveshaft, the question is, how does that affect the motor? I'm saying that it's something to do with changing the effective frequency of the driving field. The way to check that would be to look at the magnetic field at different points inside the motor. Aether thinks that the effect would be too small to make a difference but I really think it would be worthwhile to check that by measuring it.

Also, it would be worthwhile measuring the magnetic flux in the shaft, since that's apparently where the feedback is happening. I hadn't heard that figure Aether mentioned before (25 gauss) and indeed that's quite small, though not negligible. It would be interesting to know how that measurement was made - because this is an alternating magnetic field and the peak values could be very much higher than that, depending on how it was measured.

polarbreeze

Quote from: OilBarren on March 23, 2008, 09:14:50 AM

2) OH AND ALSO HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO ACCELERATE A 1/4 HP MOTOR WITH A 10 LB ROTOR FROM 300 RPM UP TO OVER 1100 RPM - WITHOUT ADDING ADDITIONAL ELECTRIC POWER -BUT JUST A 3" STEEL BAR? REMEMBER ALL OTHER PARAMETERS ARE EQUAL.


The drive-frequency theory explains that too. Higher frequency means higher slip, which means higher torque, which delivers the acceleration you observed. It does not require additional electric power input because some of the power that was formerly being dissipated as heat is instead accelerating the motor.

canam101

This thing is obviously baloney. A typical mistake or con job, where the inventor never seems to get around to feeding the 'extra' output back to the input to make it self-sustaining.

polarbreeze

Quote from: canam101 on March 23, 2008, 09:51:31 AM
This thing is obviously baloney. A typical mistake or con job, where the inventor never seems to get around to feeding the 'extra' output back to the input to make it self-sustaining.

Well, there ya go, Thane - you did ask for other theories! :)

OilBarren

"Also, it would be worthwhile measuring the magnetic flux in the shaft," [/quote]
PB

OK PB NOW TELL US HOW TO MEASURE FLUX INSIDE A STEEL SHAFT?
I SAY IT CANNOT BE DONE.
WHAT DO OTHERS SAY?

Thane