Thane Heins Perepiteia.

[wattsup]

@CP

Well I tried giving you the benefit of the doubt but I now realize you are only playing a funny game. You can do what you want thinking torque means anything special without a dynamo meter and input power measurements, that is your business, but when you post business offerings such as on page 324, then the game changes. You cannot use this venue as credibility of this forum and its members to make such offerings, especially without having first satisfied it's members of your claims.

The most capital piece of information that any intelligent OUer would eagerly already have on hand and gladly provide to all interested..........eludes you. WHY would you have trouble with such a simple concept? Power in - Power out - Duhhhhhhhh.

There is nothing wrong with tabulating true data and showing either you are OU or very close to OU. Both are perfectly acceptable. But when someone wants to deviate from or simply ignore this main issue, it falls into the realm of major shystering and that is not acceptable.

The "POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE" between a real OU device and a want-to-be is..................PROOF?
None of your videos provides this PROOF.
You only see what you want to see and ignore what is really relevant by ridiculing others saying it's joking around. Yeh, sure.

Therefore, I formally ask you to remove the following post immediately until such time as you have satisfied this Forum's due diligence. And even then, you will have to get Stefans' further permission to post such a "commercial position" on this open source Forum.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4047.msg157984#msg157984

[sushimoto]

To whom it may concern.
This thread is drifing into some strange direction.
After a lot of documentation and visualisation, suddenly Thane is going into some "licensing" scheme
supported by some well known "old economy" business-company (which is basicly somehow understandable)
and wattsup is urged to ask some very valid questions (which is very understandable).

This following community is left with lots of questionmarks on all of this.
I do enjoy funny stuff too in order to recreate a bit,
but at the end, nobody wants to be the joke himself
due to the lack of serious stuff.

Thane, wattsup?


sushi

[adlep]

Greetings,

The licensing model Thane is talking about simply means that he will not be in business of producing these generators himself. Rather he will let other companies use his technology to refine the product and then charge them a small part of their "profit".
So, if manufactures that are selling Thane tech based generators are not making any money, he will not be making any money as well...

It seems like it is a very generous business model. Kind of like a franchising.

@ Thane...
Please consider conducting "my" simple experiment with the battery that I have proposed few months ago. I have no doubt that it will show real gains coming out of your setup and it should quiet the PB types for a while but without disturbing your work schedule.

Such an experiment will not be difficult at all to conduct.

1. Get a car battery that is fully charged.
2. Connect it to the DC or AC motor.
3. Observe a run time.

Then

4. Recharge the battery.
5. Connect it to the DC or AC motor that employs your coil setup.
6. Observe a run time.

Such a run will give you a very impressive material to show to the business executives that do not care about technical details or Electrical Engineering. 

[woopy]

@all

as a junior member i have surely not the immense experience of the senior 's one

but  i like  new thing  i like new oportunities   and i am inclined to believe that we can improve our human beeing

@ wattsup

if you think that Thane is simply a faker  why do you  insist to get the PROOF  simply change the frequency to other threads on this forum    and as you said yourself very correctly " after  all this is his thread"

if i see  other threads on this forum,  there are lots of dreaming things and this very good like this      is'nt it ??

Thane show us his work and a lot of videos  with very interesting and apparently amazing  results

so if you don't  want to believe it    it is your problem

let Thane go on his very particular way to communicate  . I personaly have very good time to see somebody on this forum providing a lot of visual stuff       and i think that    one picture or better  one  video     is much worth hundreds   of    "parole"

You seems to be irritated by the licensing way he intends to go     if you don't aggree  you are free   are we intelligent people  or not  ? do we need restriction  i think exactly the contrary  we are at the time where we have to extract the best of ourself  and for that we have to take the risk   at any price      it's up to you

ok i agree with you and Sushi  i would also be very pleased if     Mr T    would answer our questions   and especially for me   1-  the continuum of the graph      and     2- is it posible to get this bloody coils



all the best to all

laurent

[hydrocontrol]

I do believe that Thane was purposely staying away from the OU claim and leaving that to others to make or confirm by replication. Why ?  Just look at others on this forum that have claimed OU or possible OU or even an idea for OU.  See how they get torn into pieces by armchair observers. Just like wolves circling the sheep. I do not blame Thane for staying away from any such OU claim.

What Thane is claiming is an improvement in efficiency.  This is significant. Take your typical gas power generator. It can produce around 4400 watts using a 6.5 HP engine. Now what if you can improve that generator so it can produce 4400 watts using a 1 hp weed eater engine. You are now talking about using a lot less gasoline to produce the same amount of energy. See it does not have to be OU to be very beneficial. All it needs to do is increase efficiency so it requires less of one form of energy to generate another form of energy. I believe that is all Thane is claiming and showing in his videos.